pe...@easthope.ca wrote:
> I've included 5 References. Lets see what the server does
> with them. Just for the record, I'm not subscribed.
It looks perfectly reasonable.
> From: Dan Ritter
> Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2019 12:01:57 -0500
> > Recently seen, might be useful for you:
> >
> >
I've included 5 References. Lets see what the server does
with them. Just for the record, I'm not subscribed.
From: Dan Ritter
Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2019 12:01:57 -0500
> Recently seen, might be useful for you:
>
> https://blog.benjojo.co.uk/post/userspace-usb-drivers
Thanks.
For a nominal
Dan Ritter wrote:
>
> I like the looks of that Inogeni, and you'd think that a public
> sector org in Vancouver would like to buy from a Canadian
> company. Or I think so, anyway.
Recently seen, might be useful for you:
https://blog.benjojo.co.uk/post/userspace-usb-drivers
-dsr-
pe...@easthope.ca wrote:
> From: Dan Ritter
> > Step 3: Does lsusb show the device?
>
> peter@dalton:~$ lsusb -vs 005 | head
> Couldn't open device, some information will be missing
>
> Bus 003 Device 005: ID 1164:f533 YUAN High-Tech Development Co., Ltd
> Device Descriptor:
> bLength
Apologies for the duplicate copy.
From: Dan Ritter
Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2019 08:03:35 -0500
> Step 1: are you using a USB3 port? It says it will not work in a
> USB2 port.
Missed that.
None of the local shops in Vancouver has a USB 3 adapter card in
stock. Amazon and etc. offer them of course.
From: Dan Ritter
Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2019 08:03:35 -0500
> Step 1: are you using a USB3 port? It says it will not work in a
> USB2 port.
Missed that.
None of the local shops in Vancouver has a USB 3 adapter card in
stock. Amazon and etc. offer them of course. 3.0 is more numerous
than 3.1
On 2019-11-09, deloptes wrote:
>
> I recall I read back then that this is imposed by Apple
What is "this" and what is its relation to the OP's original, erroneous
ratiocination (usb = UVC, the latter being a specification to which the
device in question most probably does not comply, an
deloptes wrote:
> Dan Ritter wrote:
>
> > It's typical for standards-compliant hardware to work well on
> > Linux, Windows and Mac OS without issue. When it doesn't, it's
> > probably not standards-compliant.
>
> I recall I read back then that this is imposed by Apple - you have to do
>
Dan Ritter wrote:
> It's typical for standards-compliant hardware to work well on
> Linux, Windows and Mac OS without issue. When it doesn't, it's
> probably not standards-compliant.
I recall I read back then that this is imposed by Apple - you have to do
something with them - license or verify
deloptes wrote:
> Dan Ritter wrote:
>
> > Step 4: Why do you think it's UVC compliant? I didn't see it in
> > the manual, and discussion on the web mostly seems to be about
> > how mediocre the thing is when it works, always on Windows
> > systems. StarTech doesn't even mention Mac OS, and I
Dan Ritter wrote:
> Step 4: Why do you think it's UVC compliant? I didn't see it in
> the manual, and discussion on the web mostly seems to be about
> how mediocre the thing is when it works, always on Windows
> systems. StarTech doesn't even mention Mac OS, and I think that
> they would do that
pe...@easthope.ca wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This device is an analogue video converter.
> https://www.startech.com/AV/Converters/Video/usb-3-0-video-capture-device-hdmi-dvi-vga~USB3HDCAP
>
> The output should be UVC compliant.
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USB_video_device_class
>
> Yet guvcview
On Sat, Nov 9, 2019 at 12:30 AM wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This device is an analogue video converter.
>
> https://www.startech.com/AV/Converters/Video/usb-3-0-video-capture-device-hdmi-dvi-vga~USB3HDCAP
I'm going to guess, from this site, that this Device is Proprietary
Hardware, with "Digital Rights
13 matches
Mail list logo
