On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 05:27:24PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
It really sucks that we reached this point. But since proper communication has
failed horribly to resolve this, I recognise there's no other way.
Seconded.
I hereby withdraw my second to this proposal.
Many developers were
Euh. This ought to be signed, IIRC..
On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 06:21:41PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 05:27:24PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
It really sucks that we reached this point. But since proper communication has
failed horribly to resolve this, I
I propose an amendment to this GR proposal. The text is completely replaced
by:
===
The Debian project hereby resolves:
- That the developers in charge for adding the architecture identified by
dpkg as amd64,
On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 07:00:29PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
Rationale:
- Taking technical decisions through voting is not generaly a good
idea.
Agreed.
- We're facing a communication problem, so the solution is to ease
communication between the affected parties.
This GR
Are you looking for a date in your area?
local young and mature men and women looking for a good time
Just Copy and Paste in your Broswer
onkandy.com/chick.html
lpyjutmyqulowqmdgliyvaa
kkifogvwuwjzxgiyyqdqzjokxlniic
gsatokmoipgjhmxmwtpzqkwgh
omkxxcmvawahceesmrnzugmtfgy
On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 07:00:29PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
===
The Debian project hereby resolves:
- That the developers in charge for adding the architecture identified by
dpkg as amd64, hereinafter amd64, to
On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 07:16:04PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
You cannot write a GR to order somebody to do something. That's
fundamental to the project structure, and written into the
constitution. Get used to the idea, and stop proposing GRs that don't
do anything.
Please note the use
On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 12:12:20PM -0500, Graham Wilson wrote:
- We're facing a communication problem, so the solution is to ease
communication between the affected parties.
This GR seems to force communication between ftpmaster and the porters.
I don't put in question the
* Andrew Suffield ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040728 20:25]:
On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 07:00:29PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
===
The Debian project hereby resolves:
- That the developers in charge for adding the
On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 08:51:14PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 07:16:04PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
You cannot write a GR to order somebody to do something. That's
fundamental to the project structure, and written into the
constitution. Get used to the idea,
On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 09:48:24PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
* Andrew Suffield ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040728 20:25]:
On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 07:00:29PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
===
The Debian project hereby
On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 09:04:02PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
I don't think communication will be eased by a GR forcing people to talk
to each other.
Well, since everything else has failed, I disagree.
None of these other things worked, so this one must? That's not
actually rational...
#include hallo.h
* Andrew Suffield [Wed, Jul 28 2004, 07:16:04PM]:
You cannot write a GR to order somebody to do something. That's
fundamental to the project structure, and written into the
constitution. Get used to the idea, and stop proposing GRs that don't
do anything.
You can propose
Andrew Suffield, 2004-07-28 22:20:09 +0200 :
None of these other things worked, so this one must? That's not
actually rational...
Ever heard of the Shadoks? [1] They had this saying: Keep on trying,
and you'll eventually succeed. Therefore, the more it doesn't work,
the more likely it is to
Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Andrew Suffield ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040728 20:25]:
On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 07:00:29PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
===
The Debian project hereby resolves:
- That the
On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 11:30:28PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This is a no-op by rule of the constitution.
Might be a no-op but its an ultimatum of a sort.
You could formulate it as:
That the developers in charge for adding the architecture
On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 11:05:19PM +0200, Roland Mas wrote:
Andrew Suffield, 2004-07-28 22:20:09 +0200 :
None of these other things worked, so this one must? That's not
actually rational...
Ever heard of the Shadoks? [1] They had this saying: Keep on trying,
and you'll eventually
17 matches
Mail list logo
