On Sat, Mar 04, 2006 at 09:07:18AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
* MJ Ray ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060304 01:32]:
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 02:49:37PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
If you had to summarize your platform with 3 keywords, what would
they be ?
Communication,
su, 2006-03-05 kello 03:11 +0100, Enrico Zini kirjoitti:
It would have been pointless to come out with such trivial reports.
I disagree. They let the project know that things are going on (or not
going on), and the DPL and Team are not just dormant, which was the
impression I, at least, had for
Hello Enrico,
But there's more than that. In the last year as part of the DPL Team,
people have been criticising the last year for the lack of reports. But
I don't remember a single one sending in a mail like Dear DPL[-Team],
what happened last week?.
It would have been a pleasure to
On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 09:49:29AM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
Hello Enrico,
But there's more than that. In the last year as part of the DPL Team,
people have been criticising the last year for the lack of reports. But
I don't remember a single one sending in a mail like Dear
On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 03:11:58AM +0100, Enrico Zini wrote:
But there's more than that. In the last year as part of the DPL Team,
people have been criticising the last year for the lack of reports. But
I don't remember a single one sending in a mail like Dear DPL[-Team],
what happened
On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 05:39:08PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 10:08:15PM +0100, Frank K?ster wrote:
And, do you think this code of conduct should be enforced? How?
We already have a code of conduct for the lists that's not enforced;
it says you can't swear, and
Hi,
We are now in the second and final week of this vote. At the
time of writing, 174 people have voted, out of a potential 972.
manoj
Voting period starts 00:00:01 UTC on Sunday, 26th February, 2006
Votes must be received by 23:59:59 UTC on Saturday, 11th
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 02:27:36AM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
However, what you say in your message (if people had
asked for status reports they would've received them) is blatantly
wrong. We did ask, and (usually) no good response was given.
this turns out to be interesting: we
On 8 Feb 2006, Lionel Elie Mamane verbalised:
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 08:47:10AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On 8 Feb 2006, Lionel Elie Mamane said:
On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 06:57:03PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On 7 Feb 2006, Lionel Elie Mamane spake thusly:
Should the situation
On 28 Feb 2006, Oliver Elphick uttered the following:
On Tue, 2006-02-28 at 18:36 +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
Hi,
That is meant as a statement of fact, not a personal attack. If
something is listed as a constitutional change it will certainly
bias against it those who dislike such
On 28 Feb 2006, Oliver Elphick outgrape:
On Sat, 2006-02-25 at 17:21 -0600, Debian Project Secretary wrote:
The following ballot is for voting on a General Resolution to
address the Debian project's position on the GNU Free Documentation
License. The vote is being conducted in accordance
su, 2006-03-05 kello 14:20 +0100, Enrico Zini kirjoitti:
On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 10:44:17AM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
And yes, a couple of times I did ask, although on IRC and not via
e-mail. Having to drag out information gets tiresome so I only did it a
couple of times.
Did you
su, 2006-03-05 kello 15:49 +0200, Lars Wirzenius kirjoitti:
su, 2006-03-05 kello 14:20 +0100, Enrico Zini kirjoitti:
On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 10:44:17AM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
And yes, a couple of times I did ask, although on IRC and not via
e-mail. Having to drag out information
Le dimanche 05 mars 2006 à 17:19 +1000, Anthony Towns a écrit :
2. Everyone has his own character. However, a representative has to
be cautious to avoid compromising the project as a whole. Were
you elected, would you make efforts to stop being contemptuous
in
On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 07:26:34AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Which only goes to show that you really do not understand
how Debian works. Are you not aware that vote have already been
audited before? That anyone with root on master already has access
to all ballots? That the DPL's can
On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 11:37:48AM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
Secondly, I believe the personality problems thing is about a quote of
mine on -private[1]
Actually it wasn't really a quote at all; if anyone cared I was going
to point at Ted/Jonathan's platform with remarks like Most of us are
Am Sonntag, 5. März 2006 01:24 wrote David Schmitt:
I have put a first version online at
http://debian.edv-bus.at/vote-2006/input.xml
There is now a pre-generated plain HTML version as
http://debian.edv-bus.at/vote-2006/questions.html
online. As well as a little Makefile. Kudos to
Steve McIntyre wrote:
On Sat, Mar 04, 2006 at 10:08:22AM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
Hi DPL candidates
Would you also try to reach the goals mentioned in your platform if you
wouldn't be elected DPL?
Please be specific if you think one of your goals can't be reached or
helped with without being a
* Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-03-04 13:06:37]:
Though there are often threads about problems with it on our mailing
lists, the NM process hasn't changed much in the last three or four
years. What do you think about the most common problems (takes too
long, is asking for too
* Mike Hommey [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-03-02 14:49:37]:
If you had to summarize your platform with 3 keywords, what would they be ?
- purpose-driven
- predictable
- warm and welcoming
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 10:06:34PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
1. As you are promoting the team leadership that has been in place
since Branden's election, do you have explanations for the total
absence of leadership during this time? What could you tell to
convince us it's still
Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However, what you say in your message (if people had
asked for status reports they would've received them) is blatantly
wrong. We did ask, and (usually) no good response was given.
I also asked the DPL a question about backups of the development
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 01:17:02AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 11:37:48AM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
Secondly, I believe the personality problems thing is about a quote of
mine on -private[1]
Actually it wasn't really a quote at all; if anyone cared I was going
On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 11:05:04AM -0500, Kevin B. McCarty wrote:
Hi Kevin.
I'm not sure that I understand the reasons why the efforts couldn't be
reported, at least to debian-private. Are they one or more of the
following, and if so, which?
Among your categories, the ones that most apply
* Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-03-05 18:48]:
I also asked the DPL a question about backups of the development
machines (after the CVS corruption last year) and never got any answer.
FWIW, there is a dedicated backup server now. I don't know any
details though (nor why it was never
* Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-03-04 14:13:42]:
So, my question: please name any behaviour or act you've observed with
previous DPLs (naming the name of the respective DPL is not required)
that you think was a mistake, and which you will try not to make during
your term?
I will
* Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-03-04 13:02:20]:
Though Martin 'Joey' Schulze as stable release manager presents lists of
packages that are accepted into the next stable point release on a
regular basis, they normally are not released roughly two months after
the last update
Enrico Zini wrote:
I just went back to the mail archive of that time and stopped reading
after a while because of anger rising: lots of good efforts have been
done, and the instant reaction to those was in various case absolutely
disappointing. It's all stuff you can't put in a report: you
Andreas Schuldei wrote:
Debian needs to learn to re-integrate the
improvements from derived distributions and would get a long way just
doing that. On top of that there should not be a problem becoming
more innovative ourselfs - there are enough cool problems to
solve. Listening to our users
(Please treat this question as if it were asked on debian-devel not
here.)
Anthony Towns wrote:
I do think it would be interesting for the project to embrace the d-i beta
releases and the testing-security support and turn those into regular
mini-releases, without many of the standards we
Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-03-05 18:48]:
I also asked the DPL a question about backups of the development
machines (after the CVS corruption last year) and never got any answer.
FWIW, there is a dedicated backup server now. I don't know
* Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-03-05 21:05]:
FWIW, there is a dedicated backup server now. I don't know any
details though (nor why it was never announced).
So you also don't know what is backed up, and how often?
No, I only know that there's a dedicated backup server and that it's
If you were not running for DPL, which of the other candiates would you
most likely vote for (or since you are running, rank as '2' on your
ballot)? Why?
Which of the other canidate's platform statements do you agree with, and
which do you not? If you are elected as DPL, do you think that you
* David N. Welton [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-03-05 20:41:55]:
The reason Debian can't compete with Ubuntu for the Desktop/new to Linux
users is that Ubuntu makes choices where Debian won't or can't. They
give you a default system that works well because they picked certain
things instead of
Hi,
The DPL is described as a representative of Debian to the general
public, and as a vision-definer inside the Debian Project. Also, the DPL
is given the responsibility of building good relationships with other
organizations and companies. [0]
Currently, the FOSS world is facing major
* Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-03-05 06:32:13]:
1. After the utter failure of the DPL team conducted by Branden
Robinson to provide leadership, what makes you think the team
you are proposing would do better?
I would try to avoid some flaws in last year's
* Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-02-27 12:18:55]:
Two years ago, Branden Robinson talked about the issue of some tasks in
the project that are neither delegated by the Project leader nor covered
by the Constitution directly. [1] He referenced his platform from 2004
last year
Frank Küster wrote:
* Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-03-05 18:48]:
I also asked the DPL a question about backups of the development
machines (after the CVS corruption last year) and never got any answer.
FWIW, there is a dedicated backup server now. I don't know any
details
Hi!
Just a small question:
Do all of you have many spare hours in your current schedules? Or what
part of your debian work would get lower priorities if you get elected?
Or are you planning to toss out your TV, dump your girlfriend or hire a
garden keeper ?
If other of your debian work get a
Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The missing announcement is totally my fault, so please don't blame
any DPL for this.
I don't think this is the point. If the DPL had cared about the problem
and about transparency, he'd asked you how the service is running and
why it hasn't been
On Sat, Mar 04, 2006 at 02:13:42PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
Hi,
During DPL campaigning, it seems in for candidates to propose all
sorts of Great Things they will try to do once elected. While this is
obviously all interesting information, it leaves out something that, I
think, is also fairly
On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 04:37:45PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
Steve McIntyre wrote:
Firstly, my stated goals from my platform:
1 Communications within the project
2 Mailing lists and IRC
3 Training and NM
4 Openness within the project
5 Technical standards
6 Working effectively;
On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 03:27:03PM -0500, Benjamin Seidenberg wrote:
If you were not running for DPL, which of the other candiates would you
most likely vote for (or since you are running, rank as '2' on your
ballot)? Why?
Ouch, that's a nasty question! :-)
My own favourites of the other
On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 11:30:26PM +, Sune Vuorela wrote:
Hi!
Hi Sune!
Just a small question:
Do all of you have many spare hours in your current schedules? Or what
part of your debian work would get lower priorities if you get elected?
Or are you planning to toss out your TV, dump your
On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 11:30:26PM +, Sune Vuorela wrote:
Do all of you have many spare hours in your current schedules? Or what
part of your debian work would get lower priorities if you get elected?
Or are you planning to toss out your TV, dump your girlfriend or hire a
garden keeper ?
On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 11:30:26PM +, Sune Vuorela wrote:
Do all of you have many spare hours in your current schedules? Or what
part of your debian work would get lower priorities if you get elected?
Or are you planning to toss out your TV, dump your girlfriend or hire a
garden keeper ?
Hi Ted,
In your platform you write the following:
After ten years, I am still using Debian as my developement, server,
and multimedia desktop platform. It is the best Linux developers
platform in the world. It is also an excellent server platform. Alas, I
can't say that about the
On Mon, 06 Mar 2006, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 07:26:34AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Which only goes to show that you really do not understand
how Debian works. Are you not aware that vote have already been
audited before? That anyone with root on master already
48 matches
Mail list logo
