On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 10:27:12PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Hi,
Proponents of various various amendments to the GR should feel
free to send me a couple of paragraphs in HTML markup to
introduce/explain the resolutions they are proposing. Feel free to
include external links
On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 18:46:50 -0700, Don Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
But just like the groundwork and foundation of a structure, the
non-actionable content of a resolutions can contain information on
how the actionable content is to be interpreted. As such, it is part
of the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I second this proposal.
Don Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Because there appears to be some residual confusion[1][2][3] about
what I actually proposed and its content, here is the proposal as it
currently stands. The proposal is only the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Don Armstrong schrieb am Montag, den 18. September 2006:
I also second this clarified proposal.
== BEGIN PROPOSAL =
The Free Software movement is about enabling users to modify the works
that they
On Tue, 19 Sep 2006, Martin Schulze wrote:
On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 18:46:50 -0700, Don Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
But just like the groundwork and foundation of a structure, the
non-actionable content of a resolutions can contain information on
how the actionable content is to be
Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 18:46:50 -0700, Don Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
But just like the groundwork and foundation of a structure, the
non-actionable content of a resolutions can contain information on
how the actionable content is to be
I second this proposal.
== BEGIN PROPOSAL =
The Free Software movement is about enabling users to modify the works
that they use on their computer; about giving users the same
information that copyright holders and upstream developers have. As
* Debian Project Secretaru ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060918 20:56]:
From: Frederik Schueler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 23:06:54 +0200
Good signature from EA7ED2A341954920 Frederik Schüler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
,
| 1. We affirm that our Priorities
Hi,
I second this proposal:
Don Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
== BEGIN PROPOSAL =
The Free Software movement is about enabling users to modify the works
that they use on their computer; about giving users the same
information that copyright
On Tue, 19 Sep 2006 08:40:08 +0200, Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 10:27:12PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Hi,
Proponents of various various amendments to the GR should feel free
to send me a couple of paragraphs in HTML markup to
introduce/explain the
Hi,
Due to a loop hole in the constitution, any group of 6 Debian
developers can delay any general resolution indefinitely by putting
up their own amendment, and every 6 days, making substantiative
changes in their amendment (they can just rotate between a small
number of very
On Tue, 2006-09-19 at 10:09 -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
The project should decide how it wants to handle filibustering,
if it feels like doing anything about it, of course. But now, any GR
has a veto contingent of only 6 developers.
How about we see how to solve that when it
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 10:07:18PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
Because there appears to be some residual confusion[1][2][3] about
what I actually proposed and its content, here is the proposal as it
currently stands. The proposal is only the content between BEGIN
PROPOSAL and END PROPOSAL.
I
Hi,
* Manoj Srivastava ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060919 17:57]:
Due to a loop hole in the constitution, any group of 6 Debian
developers can delay any general resolution indefinitely by putting
up their own amendment, and every 6 days, making substantiative
changes in their amendment
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 10:07:18PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
D. Requests that vendors of hardware, even those whose firmware is
not loaded by the operating system, provide the prefered form for
modification so that purchasers of their hardware can
exercise their freedom to
Seconded.
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 10:07:18PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
== BEGIN PROPOSAL =
The Free Software movement is about enabling users to modify the works
that they use on their computer; about giving users the same
information that
* Andreas Barth:
perhaps we should, independend of current GRs, consider how to change
the GR procedure so that it doesn't happen to be as painful as it is
now.
Perhaps pain is highly subjective in this case. I guess it's less
bizarre if you've been exposed to Robert's Rules of Order. (But
On Tue, 19 Sep 2006, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
On Tue, 2006-09-19 at 10:09 -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
The project should decide how it wants to handle filibustering,
if it feels like doing anything about it, of course. But now, any GR
has a veto contingent of only 6 developers.
On Tue, 19 Sep 2006, Sven Luther wrote:
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 10:07:18PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
C. Reaffirms its continued support of users whose hardware (or
software) requires works which are not freely licensed or whose
source is not available by making such works
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Since it has been decreed that the secretary has no discretion
in putting up properly proposed and seconded text, this request is
now moot.
We do have an issue now with people seconding extraneous text,
including signatures and
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 10:09:04AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Hi,
Due to a loop hole in the constitution, any group of 6 Debian
developers can delay any general resolution indefinitely by putting
up their own amendment, and every 6 days, making substantiative
changes in their
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 09:54:17AM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
Umh, then I need to ask why the resolution is not clear enough
so that it does not need the preamble to know in which way the
author has intended its interpretation? As Manoj pointed out
already, courts look at the resolution
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 10:15:14 +1000, Pascal Hakim [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 10:09:04AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Hi,
Due to a loop hole in the constitution, any group of 6 Debian
developers can delay any general resolution indefinitely by putting
up their own
23 matches
Mail list logo
