Hello,
Ok, since the proposal in its amended by Manoj form passed, we need to add an
amendment to this proposal, accordying to Manoj, so that we don't have two
proposals in effect at the same time, leaving it a full mess.
So, i propose this amendment, as discussed with Manoj, and need your
On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 03:57:28PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Probably, but then choice 1. of the ballot currently under vote
should have had 3:1 supermajority also, which added to misleading
wording of the short title compared to the actual content of the
proposal, cast some serious
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 10:52:57AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 10:17:56AM +0200, Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Notice how SC5 says : we support their use and provide infrastructure for
non-free packages. This clearly includes support for installing non-free
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 10:17:56AM +0200, Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Notice how SC5 says : we support their use and provide infrastructure for
non-free packages. This clearly includes support for installing non-free
firmware on our installer medias.
Notice how SC5 says : we support
On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 10:17:56 +0200, Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 03:57:28PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Probably, but then choice 1. of the ballot currently under vote
should have had 3:1 supermajority also, which added to misleading
wording of the short
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 08:42:41AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 10:17:56 +0200, Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 03:57:28PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Probably, but then choice 1. of the ballot currently under vote
should have had
I second the following proposal:
=== START OF PROPOSAL ===
Definition: For the purpose of this resolution, the firmware mentioned below
designates binary data included in some of the linux kernel drivers, usually
as
hex-encoded variables and whose purpose is to be loaded into a given piece
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 10:07:02AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Hello,
Ok, since the proposal in its amended by Manoj form passed, we need to add an
amendment to this proposal, accordying to Manoj, so that we don't have two
proposals in effect at the same time, leaving it a full mess.
Which 2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
=== START OF PROPOSAL ===
Definition: For the purpose of this resolution, the firmware mentioned below
designates binary data included in some of the linux kernel drivers, usually
as
hex-encoded variables and whose purpose is to be loaded into a
On Sun, 15 Oct 2006, Sven Luther wrote:
Well, we all know it is sourceless GPLed firmware, and we chose just
to say the contrary, because it is convenient to us.
If we know[1] a work is a sourceless GPLed work, then we cannot
distribute it *at* *all*. Doing otherwise is wholly inappropriate, GR
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 08:54:18PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 10:07:02AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Hello,
Ok, since the proposal in its amended by Manoj form passed, we need to add
an
amendment to this proposal, accordying to Manoj, so that we don't have two
On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 17:16:04 +0200, Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 08:42:41AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 10:17:56 +0200, Sven Luther
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 03:57:28PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Probably,
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 11:08:13PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
This is a new proposal, which was not in the ballot, because Manoj hurried the
election along the way, while he knew the kernel team was working on a better
proposal.
Please do not blame our secretary for following the
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 11:51:11PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 11:08:13PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
This is a new proposal, which was not in the ballot, because Manoj hurried
the
election along the way, while he knew the kernel team was working on a
better
Sorry, was supposed to be a private reply.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 00:02:10 +0200, Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Well, i blame Manoj (not wearing his secretary hat) for doing the
call for vote, after i had made the final proposal, proposal which
should have been consensual, and Manoj (as-DD) was aware off, and
even helped with the
I want to amendment the following proposal:
=== START OF PROPOSAL ===
Definition: For the purpose of this resolution, the firmware mentioned below
designates binary data included in some of the linux kernel drivers, usually
as
hex-encoded variables and whose purpose is to be loaded into a
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 04:05:57PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Can you spell out for us which kernel modules, in the opinion
of the kernel team, are certainly sourceless GPL stuff? Please make
sure you have the official opinion of the kernel team, and that you
are saying that
On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 02:03:59 +0200, Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 04:05:57PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Can you spell out for us which kernel modules, in the opinion of
the kernel team, are certainly sourceless GPL stuff? Please make
sure you have the
This one time, at band camp, Kurt Roeckx said:
I want to amendment the following proposal:
=== START OF PROPOSAL ===
Definition: For the purpose of this resolution, the firmware mentioned
below
designates binary data included in some of the linux kernel drivers,
usually as
20 matches
Mail list logo
