I disagree with the Policy delegation decision of our DPL [1] and
therefore propose a resolution as defined in section 4.2.2 of the Debian
constitution to delay the decision of the Debian Project Leader keeping
the Package Policy Committee as defined[2] in place until the Debian
Project Leader has
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 09:40:43PM +0200, Martin Wuertele wrote:
My reason for this proposal is the impression the revocation of the
delegation is based on the disagreement of the interpretation of the
policy between the chair of the Package Policy Committee and the Debian
Project Leader.
I
* John Goerzen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-10-25 21:55]:
You want to override a decision not because the decision is bad on its
face, but because of a *guess* as to the reason for it?
That makes no sense. What difference does the reason make? If it's a
good decision, then let it stand. If
Martin Wuertele [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I disagree with the Policy delegation decision of our DPL [1] and
therefore propose a resolution as defined in section 4.2.2 of the Debian
constitution to delay the decision of the Debian Project Leader keeping
the Package Policy Committee as
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 23:01:11 +0300, Kalle Kivimaa [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Martin Wuertele [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I disagree with the Policy delegation decision of our DPL [1] and
therefore propose a resolution as defined in section 4.2.2 of the
Debian constitution to delay the decision of
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 20:01:32 +0200, Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 01:03:11AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Next, I removed clauses that said that all the requirements of
policy must be met for a package to be in main or contrib; we know
that is not true.
I
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 01:49:03PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
p
- Packages involving shared libraries should be split up into
+ Packages involving shared libraries ought to be split up into
several binary packages. This section mostly deals with how
this separation
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 09:40:43PM +0200, Martin Wuertele wrote:
I disagree with the Policy delegation decision of our DPL [1] and
therefore propose a resolution as defined in section 4.2.2 of the Debian
constitution to delay the decision of the Debian Project Leader keeping
the Package Policy
8 matches
Mail list logo