Given that there's no easy way to get at the arguments for an
against this vote, other than wading through hundreds of -vote
mails, I cannot cast a vote.
I also don't understand why we vote whether to put something on hold
or not until we vote about it. Or at least this is what the ballot
On Sun, Oct 29, 2006 at 11:13:06AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
- - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
2808c3bb-6d17-49b6-98c8-c6a0a24bc686
[ 0 ] Choice 1: The DPL's withdrawal of the delegation remains on hold
pending a vote
[ 0 ] Choice 2: The
On Sun, Oct 29, 2006 at 11:13:06AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
Finally, I am getting annoyed by all these GRs and the waste of time
that comes with them. Maybe I should thus propose a vote to resolve
that DDs must now stop wasting time and get back to work.
Hey, you should have seconded my
On Sun, Oct 29, 2006 at 11:13:06AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
I also don't understand why we vote whether to put something on hold
or not until we vote about it. Or at least this is what the ballot
suggests:
It's a feature of the constitution: if a vote is held to reverse a DPL
decision
On 2006-10-29 Ola Lundqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have tried to determine what this vote is all about. I'm not
subscribed to either debian-vote or debian-devel so all I can
see is that is available from the web archives. I can not
find anything about this, so personally I think it is
Hi
Thanks for pointing me to information about this vote. I obviously
missed some parts of the debian-vote list, as I thought that newest
was listed first.
On Sun, Oct 29, 2006 at 12:11:10PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
On 2006-10-29 Ola Lundqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have tried to
also sprach Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.10.29.1211 +0100]:
Finally, I am getting annoyed by all these GRs and the waste of
time that comes with them. Maybe I should thus propose a vote to
resolve that DDs must now stop wasting time and get back to
work.
Hey, you should have
also sprach Hamish Moffatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.10.29.1209 +0100]:
I don't actually know whether 0/0 is as invalid as I want it to be,
but we'll see.
It should be. I voted 9/9 indicating my contempt for this vote, but it
wasn't accepted.
0/0 was not accepted. Joey (Hess), was
On Sun, Oct 29, 2006 at 11:13:06AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
- - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
2808c3bb-6d17-49b6-98c8-c6a0a24bc686
[ 0 ] Choice 1: The DPL's withdrawal of the delegation remains on hold
pending a vote
[ 0 ] Choice 2: The
also sprach Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.10.29.1613 +0100]:
But as far as I know, it's just the same as not voting.
And I'm not sure what you think an invalid vote would have as effect.
In voting systems with a quorum, an invalid vote increases the
number of cast votes and thus makes
On Sun, Oct 29, 2006 at 04:57:46PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.10.29.1613 +0100]:
But as far as I know, it's just the same as not voting.
And I'm not sure what you think an invalid vote would have as effect.
In voting systems with a
also sprach Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.10.29.1736 +0100]:
In voting systems with a quorum, an invalid vote increases the
number of cast votes and thus makes it less likely for an option to
reach the quorum (which is expressed as a percentage). Please
correct me if I am wrong.
On Sun, 29 Oct 2006 16:57:46 +0100, martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
also sprach Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.10.29.1613 +0100]:
But as far as I know, it's just the same as not voting.
And I'm not sure what you think an invalid vote would have as
effect.
In voting systems
On Sun, 29 Oct 2006 17:41:26 +0100, martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
So is there a difference between not voting and voting all options
equal?
Yes, your name is recorded as someone who voted. Has no effect
on quorum or the outcome, though.
manoj
--
QOTD: I haven't
14 matches
Mail list logo
