On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 11:33:19AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 11:11:55PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 06:00:12PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 06:35:07PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
Uh, what's this if not peer
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 07:12:31PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 11:33:19AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 11:11:55PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
Right, you could change dak. You can't/won't/? fix the process by which
the current restrictions
* Hamish Moffatt:
Do you think it's likely that it can boot the kernel and run the build
environment without crashing, but produce broken binaries?
We've got a few cases where emulated builds on amd64, sparc64 and
s390x failed to produce working binaries for i386, sparc and s390.
Usually,
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 07:12:31PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 11:33:19AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 11:11:55PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 06:00:12PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 06:35:07PM
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 09:15:17PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 07:12:31PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
Then you don't see any conflict of interest between the arm buildd admin
and the ftp-master?
No, I don't. I don't see any conflict of interest in being a package
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 11:16:56PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 09:15:17PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 07:12:31PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
Then you don't see any conflict of interest between the arm buildd admin
and the ftp-master?
No,
Hi,
Maintaining a buildd isn't trivial, there's:
- making sure they don't get rooted, and their builds compromised
- keeping the chroot up to date
- keeping in sync with w-b / sbuild changes
- keeping in sync with the infrastructure upstream (building from
incoming,
Dear Debian,
.:%%%:. .:%%%:.
.%'''%. .%'''%.
.%::' ':::%:::' '::%.
%::. Roses are red, .::%
%::. Violets are purple, .::%
'%:: It is today time I said ::%'
'%:. I
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 11:31:17AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Hamish Moffatt:
Do you think it's likely that it can boot the kernel and run the build
environment without crashing, but produce broken binaries?
We've got a few cases where emulated builds on amd64, sparc64 and
s390x
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 06:42:19PM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
So where can I send my application so that I can help out with this
stuff? I think I know how to do all of the listed things.
Judging from broad knowledge, you might send them to /dev/null for
maximum effect.
Greetings
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 06:37:25PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 11:31:17AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Hamish Moffatt:
Do you think it's likely that it can boot the kernel and run the build
environment without crashing, but produce broken binaries?
We've
Hi Marc,
On Wednesday 14 February 2007 20:21, Marc Haber wrote:
Judging from broad knowledge, you might send them to /dev/null for
maximum effect.
Do you really think constant senseless contentless ranting has _any_ (good)
effect?
regards,
Holger
pgpgXAsXBPwUQ.pgp
Description: PGP
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 10:12:19PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
On Wednesday 14 February 2007 20:21, Marc Haber wrote:
Judging from broad knowledge, you might send them to /dev/null for
maximum effect.
Do you really think constant senseless contentless ranting has _any_ (good)
effect?
At
Holger Levsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Marc,
On Wednesday 14 February 2007 20:21, Marc Haber wrote:
Judging from broad knowledge, you might send them to /dev/null for
maximum effect.
Do you really think constant senseless contentless ranting has _any_ (good)
effect?
It reminds us all
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 10:34:38PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
Holger Levsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 14 February 2007 20:21, Marc Haber wrote:
Judging from broad knowledge, you might send them to /dev/null for
maximum effect.
Do you really think constant senseless
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 10:34:38PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
Holger Levsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 14 February 2007 20:21, Marc Haber wrote:
Judging from broad knowledge, you might send them to /dev/null for
maximum effect.
Do you
Hi,
On Thu Feb 15, 2007 at 13:13:36 +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
-vote dropped
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 03:06:01PM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
Maintaining a buildd isn't trivial, there's:
- making sure they don't get rooted, and their builds compromised
- keeping the
17 matches
Mail list logo
