Re: Amendment to: reduce the length of DPL election process

Hi, On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 03:27:14PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 01:27:12PM +0100, MJ Ray wrote: Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 10:25:11AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote: Note that there could still be up to three weeks for discussion

Re: Amendment to: reduce the length of DPL election process

Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can we have a vote? Thanks for calling the vote. AIUI (tell me if I got this wrong - I'm new to this), I'm supposed to submit this summary: Point 2 stays the same, to allow three weeks buffer zone. and this WML now: vamendments/ vamendmentproposer

Re: Amendment to: reduce the length of DPL election process

On Thu, 13 Sep 2007 17:35:07 +0100, MJ Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can we have a vote? Thanks for calling the vote. AIUI (tell me if I got this wrong - I'm new to this), I'm supposed to submit this summary: Point 2 stays the same, to allow three

Re: Amendment to: reduce the length of DPL election process

Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] Since we have been in discussion for so long, would it be OK if we actually started voting on the weekend of the 23rd? [...] Fine by me. May your trip be enjoyable and less tiring than you expect. -- MJR/slef -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,