On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 22:17:14 +0200, Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 04:55:49PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> > than to keep arguing subtle points about judgement.
>>
>> Again, your description of your previous posts seems somewhat more
>> flattering than the p
On Mon, 31 Mar 2008 12:47:42 -0300, Martín Ferrari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 6:46 AM, MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > better job of them than other candidates, why deprive the project
>> > due Clint's law of pointl
On Tue, 01 Apr 2008, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> On Tuesday 1 April 2008 00:18, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > I agree that the stable security team should no longer be responsible
> > for the wordpress package,[1]
> [...]
> > 1: Though I must admit that it's not clear to me why
> > http://packages.qa.debia
On Tuesday 1 April 2008 00:18, Don Armstrong wrote:
> I agree that the stable security team should no longer be responsible
> for the wordpress package,[1]
[...]
> 1: Though I must admit that it's not clear to me why
> http://packages.qa.debian.org/w/wordpress/news/20080306T195216Z.html
> hasn't be
On Mon, 31 Mar 2008, Joey Hess wrote:
> By bringing an issue to the tech ctte, both sides of the issue have
> to give up some control, and thus reposibility. So in this case it's
> not just wordpresses's maintenance, but also the security support
> work that the security team would notmally handle
Don Armstrong wrote:
>> Well, just to pick an example, if the TC had chosen you to deal with
>> the wordpress-in-stable issue, and you had personally decided it
>> needed to be in stable, and had done whatever work was initially
>> needed to get it into stable with security support, you'd still be
Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Mar 2008, Joey Hess wrote:
> > Well, just to pick an example, if the TC had chosen you to deal with
> > the wordpress-in-stable issue, and you had personally decided it
> > needed to be in stable, and had done whatever work was initially
> > needed to get it into s
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 6:46 AM, MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > better job of them than other candidates, why deprive the project due
> > Clint's law of pointless limitations? [...]
>
> I feel that the above personalisation of argument is u
Gunnar Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> MJ Ray dijo [Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 04:16:15PM +]:
> > Well, for example, Marc Brockschmidt has spent time writing a
> > platform, canvassing and campaigning, which he suggested he would not
> > have done if an acceptable candidate had already nominated.
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 04:30:42PM +0900, NIIBE Yutaka wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> > - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> > d81e16a2-03b6-4340-84f2-51de89b8185e
> > [ 2 ] Choice 1: Steve McIntyre
> > [ 1 ] Choice 2: Raphael H
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 18:57:08 -0400, Clint Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > I would think that in a project with 1000 alleged active members, we
> > could easily limit privileged access to one instance per person
> > without any serious problems.
>
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> d81e16a2-03b6-4340-84f2-51de89b8185e
> [ 2 ] Choice 1: Steve McIntyre
> [ 1 ] Choice 2: Raphael Hertzog
> [ 4 ] Choice 3: Marc Brockschmidt
> [ 3 ] Choice 4: None Of The Abo
12 matches
Mail list logo
