On Wed, 2010-03-31 at 18:13 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Wouter Verhelst wou...@debian.org writes:
My father, for instance, often drives a screw into a piece of
wood with a chisel when he doesn't have a screwdriver around.
And I've also seen him chop off bits of wood with a
screwdriver,
Hello dear candidates,
Debian project raise it's expectation every year: higher quality, more
package, more architectures, more Desktops, etc... (cool).
How do we face the challenge to do more every year?
What would you do about it, as a DPL?
Thanks to each one of you for being candidate.
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 06:47:53AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
Agreed, but would you agree that it is a core part of the role of the
DPL/2IC, or indeed any mediator, to provide at least basic status and
progress info to the project as a whole?
Yes, absolutely. Beside this specific case---which
Hi,
I think this discussion is beginning to veer off topic, since it
is far from figuring out who to vote for, etc. This is my last post on
ths topic here, if you want to covince me of the error of my ways,
please take it to private email. If you want to change how we do things
to
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 4:57 AM, Frank Lin PIAT fp...@klabs.be wrote:
Debian project raise it's expectation every year: higher quality, more
package, more architectures, more Desktops, etc... (cool).
How do we face the challenge to do more every year?
There are two important things involved:
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 01:45:45PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
If it is not an export or a license violation that a member of the FTP team
inspects a package, then I do not think it is for any other member of the
project. I am not proposing to give a read access to the NEW queue for any
other
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 11:24:14AM -0300, Margarita Manterola wrote:
One important example is fixing bugs. Developers spend quite a
lot of time fixing bugs, and most of the time you don't need to
be a DD to fix those bugs, anybody can help out fixing more
bugs.
Another example is the
Le Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 11:53:47AM -0400, Mike O'Connor a écrit :
It doesn't take long processing NEW to realize that many DDs cannot be
trusted to make sure that all of the code they are uploading is legally
redistributable.
I also think that we need to review the NEW uploads. But this is
Le Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 09:57:38AM +0200, Frank Lin PIAT a écrit :
Debian project raise it's expectation every year: higher quality, more
package, more architectures, more Desktops, etc... (cool).
How do we face the challenge to do more every year?
What would you do about it, as a DPL?
Hi
Le Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 05:38:09PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli a écrit :
I don't like the underlying intuition that this entails, namely that the
GR proposer is somehow different from the other people which
contribute to the ballot preparation (e.g. seconders and proposers of
the initial and
Dear all,
this campaign has been much more intensive than I thought. I would like to
thank everybody for their questions, and the other candidates for their
answers. I had difficulties to keep up and regret that I could not discuss
ideas deeper with the other candidates. I am also sorry that I
On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 01:34:02AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 09:57:38AM +0200, Frank Lin PIAT a écrit :
Debian project raise it's expectation every year: higher quality, more
package, more architectures, more Desktops, etc... (cool).
How do we face the challenge
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 12:50 PM, Marcelo E. Magallon
mmaga...@debian.org wrote:
Simple question: How?
(in case it's not clear: since you seem to think it's part of
the DPL's responsabilities, how do you plan to attract people to
help with these things?)
I do not think it's part of the
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 05:15:38AM -0700, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
What about peer review of the packages?
My *peers* have no problems dealing with the build system, IMO.
As long as you tautologically define your *peers* as the set of people
willing to tolerate the gratuitous overhead
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 03:00:29PM -0300, Margarita Manterola wrote:
I do not think it's part of the DPL responsibilities. I do
think that it's something that Debian needs and that doing it
with the DPL hat on is going to make it easier, it's not a
requirement (most stuff that DPL candidates
I also think that we need to review the NEW uploads. But this is not what I
discuss here. I propose to let all DDs look what is in the NEW queue. (This
would of course help to review the NEW uploads).
If there is ever any legal fun around this, it is a *HUGE* difference
if you can say Only
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Marcelo E. Magallon mmaga...@debian.org wrote:
You say it would be easier if you were DPL. Why do you think
this is the case?
It is inevitable that people will take you more seriously when you are
the appointed leader than if you are just a random developer.
Hi,
This is the first call for votes for the Debian Project Leader
Elections 2010.
Voting period starts 00:00:00 UTC on Friday, April 2nd, 2010
Votes must be received by 23:59:59 UTC on Thursday, April 15th, 2010
This vote is being conducted as required by the Debian
Debian Project Secretary - Kurt Roeckx secret...@debian.org writes:
- - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
7efb5344-bc61-46d2-b86c-3d1b144e1236
[ 1 ] Choice 1: Stefano Zacchiroli
[ 2 ] Choice 2: Wouter Verhelst
[ 5 ] Choice 3: Charles Plessy
[ 3 ] Choice
19 matches
Mail list logo
