On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 09:40:09PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
I'll let the patch linger for a couple of days -- actually, I'll be away
for most part of tomorrow -- and then I'll apply it, posting a new
complete draft here shortly thereafter.
So I'm not considering this currently as an
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 09:48:02PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
I like that a lot more than the other wording, thus seconded.
Please don't go and make this more confusing for me. As far as I
can tell this wasn't meant to be amendment yet. He will probably
accept this or something
Le Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 02:03:01PM +0100, Matthew Johnson a écrit :
OTOH, if we pass a GR that looks like we'll give them upload rights (because
it just says they are DDs) and then they aren't given upload rights some
people might feel upset that they voted for it. Just because it's not
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 10:51:51PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
Stefano's DPL platform is actually quite clear on the subject:
snip
After seeing the results of this choice, it will always be possible to
change the procedure, especially if a later DPL is elected with a
platform that goes more
On Wed, 15 Sep 2010 16:17:40 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Before pushing it forward as an amendment, I'd like to hear opinions about
this: we have had problems with GRs proposing orthogonal options in the past.
This amendment proposal discusses two things that are orthogonal (giving full
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 04:08:50PM +0900, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 09:40:09PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
I'll let the patch linger for a couple of days -- actually, I'll be away
for most part of tomorrow -- and then I'll apply it, posting a new
complete draft here
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 10:45:52AM +0200, Simon Richter wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 09:48:02PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
I like that a lot more than the other wording, thus seconded.
Please don't go and make this more confusing for me. As far as I
can tell this wasn't meant
* Charles Plessy:
I wonder why not simply inviting the Debian Account Managers to
accept the long term contributors as DDs, even if they to not
maintain packages? Would an amendement be welcome?
Seems reasonable. (I'm among those who believe that voting rights are
more fundamental than
On 15/09/10 at 16:49 +0200, Christoph Berg wrote:
Re: Lucas Nussbaum 2010-09-15 20100915141740.ga21...@xanadu.blop.info
* Establish procedures to evaluate and accept contributors of
non-packaging work as Debian Developers.
Additionally, the Debian project acknowledges that the current
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 11:45 AM, Bernhard R. Link brl...@debian.org wrote:
My main problem with this text is that while it may fit to the current
realities, it makes no sense from a formalistic point of view, as large
parts of the text seem to imply there was no way for non-packagers yet
and
10 matches
Mail list logo
