Re: Naming of non-uploading DDs (Was: GR: welcome non-packaging contributors as Debian project members)

2010-09-18 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 06:42:18PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: Kurt, my inclination was to consider this change as falling under Constitution §A.1.3 as a change that does not alter the meaning of the proposal. That would be A.1.6? Yes, totally, sorry for the typo. My question was basicly

Re: Naming of non-uploading DDs (Was: GR: welcome non-packaging contributors as Debian project members)

2010-09-18 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 11:40:07AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: I'm hereby introducing two changes: Even better, now with attachments! -- Stefano Zacchiroli -o- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7 z...@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -- http://upsilon.cc/zack/ Quando

Re: Naming of non-uploading DDs (Was: GR: welcome non-packaging contributors as Debian project members)

2010-09-18 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 11:40:07AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: My question was basicly if you wanted to make that change at that time. My interpretation is that you didn't propose to change it at that time, but that you would do it at some later time. The question was which part

Re: Naming of non-uploading DDs (Was: GR: welcome non-packaging contributors as Debian project members)

2010-09-18 Thread Kumar Appaiah
Dear Zack, On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 11:56:32AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 11:40:07AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: I'm hereby introducing two changes: Even better, now with attachments! There is yet another pronoun I have missed. Please find a patch

Re: GR: welcome non-packaging contributors as Debian project members

2010-09-18 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, On Tue, 14.09.2010 at 17:53:46 +0900, Stefano Zacchiroli lea...@debian.org wrote: in recent events I've attended as DPL, the topic of welcoming non-packaging contributors as project members has been a recurring one. Since it was also part of my platform and since DPL terms don't last

Re: GR: welcome non-packaging contributors as Debian project members

2010-09-18 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Hi, On 18/09/10 16:43, Toni Mueller wrote: On Tue, 14.09.2010 at 17:53:46 +0900, Stefano Zacchiroli lea...@debian.org wrote: in recent events I've attended as DPL, the topic of welcoming non-packaging contributors as project members has been a recurring one. Since it was also part of my

Re: GR: welcome non-packaging contributors as Debian project members

2010-09-18 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, On Tue, 14.09.2010 at 17:53:46 +0900, Stefano Zacchiroli lea...@debian.org wrote: in recent events I've attended as DPL, the topic of welcoming non-packaging contributors as project members has been a recurring one. Since it was also part of my platform and since DPL terms don't last

Re: GR: welcome non-packaging contributors as Debian project members

2010-09-18 Thread Ben Finney
Toni Mueller t...@debian.org writes: I am uncomfortable with this wording: * Active contributors of non-packaging work, which share Debian values s/which/who/, imho. Are any native speakers around? My opinion as a NSoE matches yours on this point. -- \“Telling pious lies to