]] Russ Allbery
(Cc to owner@bugs, M-F-T to -project.)
Note that we already did do something about it by deprecating close in the
BTS in favor of sending a real email message to -done that is copied to
the submitter. The Debian BTS now nags the maintainer about telling the
submitter
On 03.04.2013 06:09, Chris Knadle wrote:
On Tuesday, April 02, 2013 20:34:28, Russ Allbery wrote:
Note that we already did do something about it by deprecating close
in the
BTS in favor of sending a real email message to -done that is copied
to
the submitter. The Debian BTS now nags the
Wouter Verhelst writes (Re: [all candidates] Debian as an FSF Free Software
Distribution):
Personally, I think we shouldn't be worried about the FSF's opinion
regarding the freeness of our distribution any more than the FSF is
worried about our opinion of the GFDL.
My starting point is that
Lucas Nussbaum writes (Re: [all candidates] on distribution-wide changes and
scalability):
On 14/03/13 at 17:55 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
- Debian should decide to use a single VCS (say, Git), for all packages,
uniform repository structure and work-flow, and give by default
Chris Knadle writes (Re: [all candidates] Removing or limiting DD rights?):
On Tuesday, April 02, 2013 13:53:24, Ian Jackson wrote:
The purpose of a bug report is not to help solve the submitter's
problem.
... No, I don't agree with this. I understand that this reteoric
helps explain
[your mail-to-news gateway seems to keep the Newsgroup header in the
mail, which confuses my MUA. Dunno if that's a bug, but you might want
to look into it]
On 03-04-13 14:38, Ian Jackson wrote:
Wouter Verhelst writes (Re: [all candidates] Debian as an FSF Free Software
Distribution):
Ian Jackson ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk writes:
From the point of view of the bug reporter, the message the DD has
sent (whether intended or not) is I'm not even going to dignify
this with a response. *click* It's not /only/ this rudeness
that's the problem, though; the bug reporter has
What are the candidates opinion on the current release process?
Can it be improved? What role should the DPL play in such work?
Thanks - with apologies for raising this at a release-sensitive
time, but obviously it has to be at a vote-appropriate time…
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On 2013-04-03 09:38, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
What are the candidates opinion on the current release process?
Can it be improved? What role should the DPL play in such work?
Thanks - with apologies for raising this at a release-sensitive
time, but obviously it has to be at a vote-appropriate
On Wednesday, April 03, 2013 09:40:50, Ian Jackson wrote:
Chris Knadle writes (Re: [all candidates] Removing or limiting DD
rights?):
On Tuesday, April 02, 2013 13:53:24, Ian Jackson wrote:
The purpose of a bug report is not to help solve the submitter's
problem.
... No, I don't
On 3 Apr 2013, at 17:29, Moray Allan mo...@sermisy.org wrote:
The campaign period already finished a few days ago
Yes, I was aware of that when I posted, but RL interfered with me asking prior
to voting opening. I sought advice as to whether it was appropriate to ask
further Qs and got a
On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 06:36:14PM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
On 3 Apr 2013, at 17:29, Moray Allan mo...@sermisy.org wrote:
The campaign period already finished a few days ago
Yes, I was aware of that when I posted, but RL interfered with me asking
prior to voting opening. I sought
12 matches
Mail list logo
