There is what I consider an unnecessary problem with later-no-harm [1] in
Debian's use of the Condorcet voting method in the Debian Constitution
§A.6.3 [2].
The problem was visible in the recent CTTE init system vote, as noted by fx
Steve Langasek [3]. Given options
* systemd (D)
* upstart (U)
*
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 01:18:21PM +0100, Thue Janus Kristensen wrote:
There is what I consider an unnecessary problem with later-no-harm [1] in
Debian's use of the Condorcet voting method in the Debian Constitution
§A.6.3 [2].
This also reminded me of
Hallo,
the Condorcet criterion and the later-no-harm criterion
are incompatible. Therefore, the fact that Debian's Condorcet
method violates the later-no-harm criterion doesn't come
from the order of its checks.
Markus Schulze
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
Markus Schulze:
the Condorcet criterion and the later-no-harm criterion
are incompatible. Therefore, the fact that Debian's Condorcet
method violates the later-no-harm criterion doesn't come
from the order of its checks.
That may be so, but our method of removing choices that fail to
4 matches
Mail list logo