On Mon, 18 Jul 2016, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 05:56:12PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > In response to the helpful comments, I've modified my proposed amendment
> > to Nicolas's resolution by adding "at minimum", and now propose the
> > following amendment:
[...]
> So this am
On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 05:56:12PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> In response to the helpful comments, I've modified my proposed amendment
> to Nicolas's resolution by adding "at minimum", and now propose the
> following amendment:
>
> === BEGIN GR TEXT ===
>
> Title: Declassifying parts of -priva
Jonathan Dowland writes ("Re: Proposed GR: Acknowledge that the debian-private
list will remain private"):
> However, this approach for me is less acceptable if there is a diminished
> chance of such "flame-retardant" discussions from ever being declassified,
> which I think would be the case afte
Jonathan Dowland writes ("Re: Amendment to Proposed GR: Declassifying parts of
-private of historical interest"):
> Although this part of the text originates from the original GR text and
> not Don's amendment, my comment applies as much to the amended text so
> I'm threading it here:
>
> On Sun,
Hi Ian,
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 01:17:20PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Thanks for your message.
You're welcome, thanks.
> Don's proposed resolution clearly does not close the door. It makes
> it possible for someone who is interested in declassification to try
> to develop a workable process,
Although this part of the text originates from the original GR text and
not Don's amendment, my comment applies as much to the amended text so
I'm threading it here:
On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 05:56:12PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> 3. In keeping with paragraph 3 of the Debian Social Contract, Debia
tl;dr:
pls can we create debian-members@l.d.o with posting acceptance rules
copied from debian-devel-announce[1] and subscriber list maintained in
sync with debian-private.
(Reply-to set to -project.)
We've been having a good conversation on -vote about the
declassification of -private. W
Jonathan Dowland writes ("Re: Proposed GR: Acknowledge that the debian-private
list will remain private"):
> This seems a shame to me. It's a promotion of pragmatism over idealism,
> suggesting that despite the project believing that a course of action is
> the right one, it won't happen, pre-supp
Don Armstrong writes ("Amendment to Proposed GR: Declassifying parts of
-private of historical interest"):
> In response to the helpful comments, I've modified my proposed amendment
> to Nicolas's resolution by adding "at minimum", and now propose the
> following amendment:
>
> === BEGIN GR TEXT
also sprach Don Armstrong [2016-07-18 02:56 +0200]:
> === BEGIN GR TEXT ===
>
> Title: Declassifying parts of -private of historical interest
>
> 1. The 2005 General Resolution titled "Declassification of debian-private
>list archives" is repealed.
>
> 2. Debian listmasters and/or other ind
On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 05:56:12PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
>
> === BEGIN GR TEXT ===
>
> Title: Declassifying parts of -private of historical interest
>
> 1. The 2005 General Resolution titled "Declassification of debian-private
>list archives" is repealed.
>
> 2. Debian listmasters and
This seems a shame to me. It's a promotion of pragmatism over idealism,
suggesting that despite the project believing that a course of action is
the right one, it won't happen, pre-supposing any future interest or
effort will not exist, which is quite pessimistic (however realistic);
essentially cl
On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 05:56:12PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> === BEGIN GR TEXT ===
>
> Title: Declassifying parts of -private of historical interest
>
> 1. The 2005 General Resolution titled "Declassification of debian-private
>list archives" is repealed.
>
> 2. Debian listmasters and/or
On Sun, 2016-07-17 17:56:12 -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> === BEGIN GR TEXT ===
>
> Title: Declassifying parts of -private of historical interest
>
> 1. The 2005 General Resolution titled "Declassification of debian-private
>list archives" is repealed.
>
> 2. Debian listmasters and/or other
* Don Armstrong , 2016-07-17, 17:56:
=== BEGIN GR TEXT ===
Title: Declassifying parts of -private of historical interest
1. The 2005 General Resolution titled "Declassification of
debian-private list archives" is repealed.
2. Debian listmasters and/or other individuals delegated by the DPL t
Seconded.
On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 05:56:12PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> === BEGIN GR TEXT ===
>
> Title: Declassifying parts of -private of historical interest
>
> 1. The 2005 General Resolution titled "Declassification of debian-private
>list archives" is repealed.
>
> 2. Debian listmas
16 matches
Mail list logo