Re: Q: NEW process licence requirements

Hi Adrian, > A constant source of frustration is the intransparent licence > checking process in NEW, and intransparency regarding what the > ftp team considers mandatory for debian/copyright. Thanks for your question. So, I won't specifically respond to any of the separate sub-issues in this

Q: NEW process licence requirements

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 09:58:16AM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote: >... > Just as one example, the NEW queue process certainly has some of these > "Chesterton's Fences" [0] at the moment, and making it more transparent > and descriptive in places would —

Question: What would you like to see {more,less} of?

Dear -vote, Due to the absense of the usual tête-à-tête on -vote this year, to stimulate the conversation further I thought I might pose a question to the electorate myself. Therefore, what would you like to see *more* of from a Project Leader? What would would you like to see less of? Best