On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 11:27:28PM +0200, Timo Röhling wrote:
> * Adrian Bunk [2021-04-11 20:53]:
> > I am not saying people were stupid.
> Okay, that was hyperbolic. But you have to admit that you don't seem to
> put much confidence in people's ability (or willingness) to read the
> explanations
> "Gunnar" == Gunnar Wolf writes:
Gunnar> I would not like to remove the expressive option of stating
Gunnar> '-' as a synonym to "below all other options".
We are in agreement.
However, I think Adrian has made a point that there are some non-obvious
consequences if you don't fully
Sam Hartman dijo [Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 06:12:31AM -0400]:
> I'd support revising the instructions to recommend that voters rank all
> options on the ballot.
>
> I don't support mandating it.
> If someone doesn't rank an option I'd rather accept a ballot than reject
> it.
> If someone wrote a
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 02:20:37PM +0200, Ansgar wrote:
> Adrian Bunk writes:
> > Discussing and voting on a change to the constitution to make all votes
> > secret could then be done in 1+1 weeks starting even before the current
> > GR ends, followed by a secret vote on a new GR.
>
> The 1+1
Adrian Bunk writes:
> Discussing and voting on a change to the constitution to make all votes
> secret could then be done in 1+1 weeks starting even before the current
> GR ends, followed by a secret vote on a new GR.
The 1+1 weeks would only start after a proposal was made that no longer
needs
On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 10:57:27PM +0200, Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote:
> I've discussed with another Front Desk member about adding a question on
> our voting system in the nm templates.
>
> The idea being to make sure if people have questions, they get some
> answers, and otherwise relevant
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 12:12:23PM +0200, Jonathan Carter wrote:
>...
> As for cancelling the vote, I see that as something that's a much more
> severe route and that I won't be imposing as DPL. For that to happen
> there would have to be significant consensus within the project that
> would have
Hi Jonathan,
Quoting Jonathan Carter (2021-04-12 12:12:23)
> Over the course of the last few days, I've received many mails
> regarding the RMS GR, both on this list, on debian-private and in
> private. These mails contain a wide spectrum of concerns and even
> ideas on how to improve our
> "Adrian" == Adrian Bunk writes:
Adrian> My suggestion would help people to make full use of their
Adrian> vote by forcing them to rank all options.
Adrian> Equal ranking is still possible, it would not remove your
Adrian> freedom to rank any number of options equally.
I'd
Hi Debian Developers
Over the course of the last few days, I've received many mails regarding
the RMS GR, both on this list, on debian-private and in private. These
mails contain a wide spectrum of concerns and even ideas on how to
improve our situation, each of which come with their own set of
On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 11:27:28PM +0200, Timo Röhling wrote:
> * Adrian Bunk [2021-04-11 20:53]:
>...
> > It can be hard to vote correctly in a voting system that is very
> > different from what you are used to in real life, unless you are
> > a nerd in voting systems.
> If you ask me as someone
Hi,
11.04.21 09:53 Kurt Roeckx:
> I think the best way to make the vote secret is that the DPL makes a
> decision. We have a process that can deal with people not agreeing
> with that decision.
Let's suppose the DPL decides the vote should be secret. Some people might
then vote based on the
Le dimanche, 11 avril 2021, 23.10:53 h CEST Jonathan Wiltshire a écrit :
> So I suggest the DPL directs under s5.1 something like:
>
> "The secretary shall delay publication of the the association between
> identify and ballot on the tally sheet, for a period of not more than 90
> days, unless
13 matches
Mail list logo
