Re: Secret Ballots: Handling Disagreement with the Secretary

2022-02-11 Thread Felix Lechner
Hi, On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 9:22 PM Don Armstrong wrote: > > That said, if a majority uses the blunt force of ยง4.1.7 to try to get > its way by removing people, I'd be more concerned about the health of > the project than whether we had written rules to prevent it. I'd be more concerned about the

Re: Secret Ballots: Handling Disagreement with the Secretary

2022-02-11 Thread Holger Levsen
On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 02:30:53PM +0100, Philip Hands wrote: > My reason (and maybe Holger's too) is I'd say that there is no > possibility of guaranteeing real permanent absolute secrecy in a vote > that we can practically conduct over the Internet (at least, not one > where the results are also

Re: Secret Ballots: Handling Disagreement with the Secretary

2022-02-11 Thread Philip Hands
Holger Levsen writes: > On Sun, Jan 30, 2022 at 03:58:50PM +, Holger Levsen roughly wrote: >> On Sat, Jan 29, 2022 at 03:22:24PM -0700, Sam Hartman wrote: >> > In my proposal all ballots would be secret, and the secretary would not >> > make a determination about that. >> what's the definitio

Re: Secret Ballots: Handling Disagreement with the Secretary

2022-02-11 Thread Holger Levsen
On Sun, Jan 30, 2022 at 03:58:50PM +, Holger Levsen roughly wrote: > On Sat, Jan 29, 2022 at 03:22:24PM -0700, Sam Hartman wrote: > > In my proposal all ballots would be secret, and the secretary would not > > make a determination about that. > what's the definition of 'secret' here? I'd still