Hi,
On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 9:22 PM Don Armstrong wrote:
>
> That said, if a majority uses the blunt force of ยง4.1.7 to try to get
> its way by removing people, I'd be more concerned about the health of
> the project than whether we had written rules to prevent it.
I'd be more concerned about the
On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 02:30:53PM +0100, Philip Hands wrote:
> My reason (and maybe Holger's too) is I'd say that there is no
> possibility of guaranteeing real permanent absolute secrecy in a vote
> that we can practically conduct over the Internet (at least, not one
> where the results are also
Holger Levsen writes:
> On Sun, Jan 30, 2022 at 03:58:50PM +, Holger Levsen roughly wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 29, 2022 at 03:22:24PM -0700, Sam Hartman wrote:
>> > In my proposal all ballots would be secret, and the secretary would not
>> > make a determination about that.
>> what's the definitio
On Sun, Jan 30, 2022 at 03:58:50PM +, Holger Levsen roughly wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 29, 2022 at 03:22:24PM -0700, Sam Hartman wrote:
> > In my proposal all ballots would be secret, and the secretary would not
> > make a determination about that.
> what's the definition of 'secret' here?
I'd still
4 matches
Mail list logo