Re: [RFC] General Resolution to deploy tag2upload

On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 10:43:04PM +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote: > On Wed, 12 Jun 2024 at 22:35, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > > > > On 17258 March 1977, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > > > >> Whatever end goals some individuals may have is *NOT* a good base to > > >> decide on how a technical implementation for

Re: Some thoughts about Diversity and the CoC

On Fri, 13 Dec 2019, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 08:46:35PM +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > On Wed, 11 Dec 2019, Sam Hartman wrote: > > > > TL;DR: Treating people with respect is hard and very contextual. > > > Choosing to change how you talk

Re: Some thoughts about Diversity and the CoC

On Wed, 11 Dec 2019, Sam Hartman wrote: > TL;DR: Treating people with respect is hard and very contextual. > Choosing to change how you talk about something to make people more > comfortable doesn't always mean you were obligated to make that change. > Sometimes you're just promoting connection. *

Re: Debian presence on newer platforms

On Wed, 27 Mar 2019, Jonas Meurer wrote: > Hi Alex, > > Alexander Wirt: > > On Tue, 26 Mar 2019, Jonas Meurer wrote: > >> Alexander Wirt: > >>> In my experience as a former mailman admin and listadmin mailman is a > >>> no-go. > >>> Ge

Re: Debian presence on newer platforms

On Tue, 26 Mar 2019, Jonas Meurer wrote: > Hi Alex, > > Alexander Wirt: > >> While I agree that some "more modern" going way would be nice for lists, > >> I don't think that is an easy task. Nor one where DPL can do much > >> (unless listmaster

Re: Debian presence on newer platforms

On Mon, 25 Mar 2019, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > On 15352 March 1977, ans...@debian.org wrote: > > > Do you think Debian should be more active to establish (official) > > presence on newer platforms? > > For those that are free, sure. > > > In particular I also wonder if Debian should look at Matrix

Re: GR proposal: code of conduct

On Wed, 26 Feb 2014, Wouter Verhelst wrote: Hi, *snip* > > - the CoC, can only be an extension to our (lists.d.o) Coc [1], as there are > > missing the mail/list specific parts. > > Hm. The whole point of this exercise was to replace that code of conduct with > a more generic and up-to-date one

Re: GR proposal: code of conduct

On Tue, 25 Feb 2014, Ean Schuessler wrote: > - "Steve McIntyre" wrote: > > > I'm not sure how wiki.d.o bans would fit. We *could* list banned > > users > > on a specific page, I guess. But the vast majority of the bans we > > ever > > enact are for spamming. > > I feel like spamming and tro

Re: GR proposal: code of conduct

On Thu, 20 Feb 2014, Wouter Verhelst wrote: Hi, > Op donderdag 13 februari 2014 14:13:40 schreef Alexander Wirt: > > On Thu, 13 Feb 2014, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > > If indeed listmasters do object (which I don't think will be the case, > > > but of course

Re: GR proposal: code of conduct

On Thu, 13 Feb 2014, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 10:49:51PM +, Ian Jackson wrote: > > Wouter Verhelst writes ("Re: GR proposal: code of conduct"): > > > > > 2. The initial text of this code of conduct replaces the "mailinglist > > > > >code of conduct" at > > > > > ht

Re: Proposal to delay the decition of the DPL of the withdrawal of the Package Policy Committee delegation

Martin Wuertele schrieb am Mittwoch, den 25. Oktober 2006: I second the quoted proposal > I disagree with the Policy delegation decision of our DPL [1] and > therefore propose a resolution as defined in section 4.2.2 of the Debian > constitution to delay the decision of the Debian Project Leader

Re: Proposal: Source code is important for all works in Debian, and required for programmatic ones

m http://rzlab.ucr.edu > > Don Armstrong > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]">[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > >René van Bevern > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]">[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >Frank Küster >

Re: Proposal: Source code is important for all works in Debian, and required for programmatic ones

Alexander Wirt schrieb am Freitag, den 25. August 2006: > Don Armstrong schrieb am Donnerstag, den 24. August 2006: > > > I'd like to propose the following option to the current GR process. > I second this proposal. I have to say a few mores word to it. It would be fully ok

Re: Proposal: Source code is important for all works in Debian, and required for programmatic ones

Don Armstrong schrieb am Donnerstag, den 24. August 2006: > I'd like to propose the following option to the current GR process. I second this proposal. > > As I will (starting late sunday PDT) be away for a week and a few days > at Burning Man,[i] I will be unable to appropriately respond to > c

Questions about kroogers platform

Hi, I have just one question, how do you explain the differences about your platform and your statements posted in this thread: http://lists.debian.org/debian-women/2004/07/msg00217.html Alex -- Alexander "formorer" Wirt KeyID: BC7D020A EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]ICQ: 28651245 signature.

Re: -= PROPOSAL =- Release sarge with amd64

Am 13.07.2004 um 14:43 schrieb Josselin Mouette: The Debian project, based on its Social Contract stating that its priorities are its users and free software, recognizing that the AMD64-based architectures are likely to become the most widespread on personal computers and workstations in a near fu