I second the resolution.
On Fri, May 16, 2003 at 12:42:59PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi folks,
This GR was first broached on December 14th, 18th and 19th,
2000, by Raul Miller. A election methods committee was set up to
examine
to debian-www...
Which will be later tonight. Sorry for the delay.
--
.--==-=====-=-.
/ Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 02:56:47AM -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
On Wed, 27 Mar 2002 00:06:10 -0500
Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One side affect of this is that if you only put a number next to one
person's name, and leave the rest blank, your vote pretty much means
nothing
to debian-www...
Which will be later tonight. Sorry for the delay.
--
.--==-=====-=-.
/ Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 05:07:31PM -0500, Norbert Veber wrote:
On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 12:06:10AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
I just want to remind everyone about how this voting works under the
hood. You are better off not leaving options blank, for the simple
reason that leaving it blank
--
.--==-=====-=-.
/ Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=-----==-===---=--=---'
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
.--==-=====-=-.
/ Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=-----==-===---=--=---'
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
.--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/ Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux--WatchGuard.com \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
pgpjx1vbFPNm4.pgp
Description: PGP
(IOW, this is it, unless something unforseen
occurs with the candidates).
21:00 UTC Saturday, March 23, 2002
Thanks to the candidates for being open to scheduling this!
--
.--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/ Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux
it.
--
.--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/ Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux--WatchGuard.com \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
(IOW, this is it, unless something unforseen
occurs with the candidates).
21:00 UTC Saturday, March 23, 2002
Thanks to the candidates for being open to scheduling this!
--
.--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/ Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux
it.
--
.--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/ Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux--WatchGuard.com \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
--
.--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/ Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux--WatchGuard.com \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe
On Sat, Mar 09, 2002 at 05:17:07PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Le Sat, Mar 09, 2002 at 10:10:29AM -0500, Ben Collins ?crivait:
We have tentatively scheduled an IRC Debate for the DPL candidates
around March 23rd 04:00 UTC. The times for the US work out to:
Ben, given my timezone it's
On Sat, Mar 09, 2002 at 06:11:12PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Le Sat, Mar 09, 2002 at 11:28:44AM -0500, Ben Collins ?crivait:
I want to get feedback from the candidates, since the times should
prefer their schedule. We as panelists can either work around it, or
give our regrets
--
.--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/ Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux--WatchGuard.com \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
On Sat, Mar 09, 2002 at 05:17:07PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Le Sat, Mar 09, 2002 at 10:10:29AM -0500, Ben Collins ?crivait:
We have tentatively scheduled an IRC Debate for the DPL candidates
around March 23rd 04:00 UTC. The times for the US work out to:
Ben, given my timezone it's
On Sat, Mar 09, 2002 at 06:11:12PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Le Sat, Mar 09, 2002 at 11:28:44AM -0500, Ben Collins ?crivait:
I want to get feedback from the candidates, since the times should
prefer their schedule. We as panelists can either work around it, or
give our regrets
On Sat, Mar 09, 2002 at 06:27:02PM +0100, Ralf Treinen wrote:
On Sat, Mar 09, 2002 at 11:28:44AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
On Sat, Mar 09, 2002 at 05:17:07PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Le Sat, Mar 09, 2002 at 10:10:29AM -0500, Ben Collins ?crivait:
We have tentatively scheduled an IRC
!)
Beggers can't be choosers. This is what Brainfood (graciously) provides
us, and we accept it with open arms and thank them for it every day.
--
.--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/ Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux--WatchGuard.com
, I can't do anything but relay to debian-admin anyway).
Ben
--
.--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/ Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux--WatchGuard.com \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
!)
Beggers can't be choosers. This is what Brainfood (graciously) provides
us, and we accept it with open arms and thank them for it every day.
--
.--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/ Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux--WatchGuard.com
On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 03:02:04PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Crypto in main is already being moved forward. It will probably be in
working condition by the time a new DPL takes office. I'd go for some
better more forward-looking questions
On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 03:25:37PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Legal FUD is not going to stop the momentum we already have. Almost all
of our ducks are in a row already. Two high profile lawyers (SPI's and
HP's) have already looked over
On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 03:44:05PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Given that I'm not a candidate, I don't think I helped you much. :) Just
trust that crypto-in-main is a done deal all on it's own at some point
in the near future, thanks
. It will probably be in
working condition by the time a new DPL takes office. I'd go for some
better more forward-looking questions.
--
.--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/ Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux--WatchGuard.com
On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 03:02:04PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Crypto in main is already being moved forward. It will probably be in
working condition by the time a new DPL takes office. I'd go for some
better more forward-looking questions
On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 03:25:37PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Legal FUD is not going to stop the momentum we already have. Almost all
of our ducks are in a row already. Two high profile lawyers (SPI's and
HP's) have already looked over
On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 03:44:05PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Given that I'm not a candidate, I don't think I helped you much. :) Just
trust that crypto-in-main is a done deal all on it's own at some point
in the near future, thanks in no part
On Mon, Feb 11, 2002 at 04:17:01PM -0600, Debian Project Secretary wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi folks,
This is a preliminary recommendation from the folks examining
voting methods. I am not sure we can use this for the coming election
as the primary
On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 12:29:19AM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Ben Collins wrote:
Do you still have the code I sent you last election?
Ahh.. so that is how you managed to win that time! ;)
Damnit. I always forget to remove the mailing list from the Cc on
private replies
of the project, that they make
reasonable assurances that the discussion wont be leaked.
How hard is that?
--
.--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/ Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL
On Sun, Nov 04, 2001 at 02:06:59PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Sat, Nov 03, 2001 at 10:46:50PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
On Sun, Nov 04, 2001 at 12:34:36PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
snip The Rest of the Story
Legislating where you can and can't talk about Debian issues
it is important, but I can also understand the frustration
of getting onsolicited email. A list would allow people to get access if
they wanted.
Ben
--
.--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/ Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux
On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 07:47:47AM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
Ok, voting is over, Ben Collins is our new leader.
I'm literally overwhelmed.
Here's how people voted:
I was under the impression that ballots were supposed to be kept secret
for DPL elections
ver Non-of-the above
1 For Ben over Anand
1 For Ben over Branden
1 For Ben over Non-of-the above
1 For Anand over Branden
1 For Anand over Non-of-the above
--
---===-=-==-=---=--------=-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage...
On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 07:47:47AM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
Ok, voting is over, Ben Collins is our new leader.
I'm literally overwhelmed.
Here's how people voted:
I was under the impression that ballots were supposed to be kept secret
for DPL elections
For Ben over Anand
1 For Ben over Branden
1 For Ben over Non-of-the above
1 For Anand over Branden
1 For Anand over Non-of-the above
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL
On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 12:51:11PM +0100, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 09:24:45AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
I would certainly not like to vote for someone who just said "I'll
support whatever the project supports", since that would not be a
"
On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 09:21:36PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 09:24:45AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
I would certainly not like to vote for someone who just said "I'll
support whatever the project supports", since that would not be a
"leader" at
On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 07:54:46PM +0100, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 10:38:02AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
You misunderstand. Having an opinion and trying to "lead" the project does
not mean overriding the Developers' final decisions. Obviously the DPL
ca
On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 12:51:11PM +0100, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 09:24:45AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
I would certainly not like to vote for someone who just said I'll
support whatever the project supports, since that would not be a
leader at all, but a follower
On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 09:21:36PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 09:24:45AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
I would certainly not like to vote for someone who just said I'll
support whatever the project supports, since that would not be a
leader at all, but a follower
On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 05:50:23AM -1000, Brian Russo wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 10:38:02AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 12:51:11PM +0100, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 09:24:45AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
I would certainly not like to vote
On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 07:54:46PM +0100, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 10:38:02AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
You misunderstand. Having an opinion and trying to lead the project does
not mean overriding the Developers' final decisions. Obviously the DPL
can have one opinion
ne who just said "I'll
support whatever the project supports", since that would not be a
"leader" at all, but a follower :)
Ben
--
---===-=-==-=====---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Li
the project supports, since that would not be a
leader at all, but a follower :)
Ben
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL
even if he can't
directly change the outcome.
Ben
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=------
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL
directly change the outcome.
Ben
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
is totally out of rfc?
Yeah, I know, real men use Emacs...
I submitted mine via mutt, detached, and it worked fine.
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Thu, Mar 08, 2001 at 02:25:55PM +0100, Torsten Landschoff wrote:
On Mon, Mar 05, 2001 at 12:25:06AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
have been guilty of it just the same as anyone else. Sometimes the
non-US developers catch flames simply because they did not understand
a post, or because
On Thu, Mar 08, 2001 at 02:25:55PM +0100, Torsten Landschoff wrote:
On Mon, Mar 05, 2001 at 12:25:06AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
have been guilty of it just the same as anyone else. Sometimes the
non-US developers catch flames simply because they did not understand
a post, or because
this
situation properly.
I can confirm that this message came through ok, and gpg verified it
just fine (through mutt).
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Thu, Mar 08, 2001 at 12:24:29AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
On Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 11:45:58PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
On Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 10:31:00PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
* What do you think will be the three major problems Debian will face
over the next
oddities
in our complex dist that requires the buildd operator to actually
manually build the package (IOW, no bug at all, just a manual build).
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux
On Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 11:30:28AM +1100, Brian May wrote:
"Ben" == Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ben non-US developers catch flames simply because they did not
Ben understand a post, or because they did not word their own
Are you implying that non-US (eg.
On Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 11:30:28AM +1100, Brian May wrote:
Ben == Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ben non-US developers catch flames simply because they did not
Ben understand a post, or because they did not word their own
Are you implying that non-US (eg. Australian
.
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
pgpOnNHNEi9Rg.pgp
Description: PGP
implementation is not near a final stage (in the kernel or in glibc).
Ben
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
I'm going to write this in a Q/A format, mainly because these are
commonly asked questions, so I wanted to answer them in a direct way.
Q.
Who are you?
A.
My name is Ben Collins. I am a husband of 6 years, and father to 4
year and 6 month old boys. I'm 28 years old and currently working
On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 06:05:49PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
One of these areas is visibility. We all know that the DPL is a figure
head for Debian. They get invited to all the neat Linux expos. Quite
honestly, being a father/husband, I may not be able to travel as much as
recent DPL's
:05:49PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
One of these areas is visibility. We all know that the DPL is a figure
head for Debian. They get invited to all the neat Linux expos. Quite
honestly, being a father/husband, I may not be able to travel as much as
recent DPL's, are as much as any of the other
On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 03:57:24AM -, Raul Miller wrote:
I'll be posting a ballot soon.
Is "soon" three weeks? The ballots aren't sent till after the
campaigning period is over, in the past.
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=------
/ B
Just to be sure, here is my signed nomination as well.
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED
starts off on equal
footing. I think we need to stick with this format.
Ben
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=------
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL
on equal
footing. I think we need to stick with this format.
Ben
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
]
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
pgpm5j45EITD7
perfectly. It processed my vote just fine.
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
of the candidates meet at a bar and start
drinking. Last one standing (or atleast sitting, or at a very minimum,
holding up the table), wins the election. We could even call it DPL fest
2000 :)
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins
I scrolled through the submitted posts to the debate from others and came
across this one which was directed at me, so I wanted to answer it (since
there wasn't time on IRC).
-
Question to Ben Collins:
as you are talking frequently about new structures, better control
and so on.
What
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
pgp2lkzmyz9Pb.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, Jan 28, 2000 at 04:03:32PM +0100, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
Hi Ben,
Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What I'de like to see in Debian is more of a hierarchy for strong
decision making, and give every developer a chance to be
involved. Do not confuse this with more
Well here goes, another year, another election. After last year most would
think I wouldn't even step near this election, but hey, I like pain :)
Some of you might remember from the last election that I was pretty straight
forward with a lot of my views, sometimes even pretty harsh in exspressing
On Tue, Jul 06, 1999 at 10:45:14AM -0400, Brian Almeida wrote:
The truth is out there, dude. Probably the Evil Cabal at work again.
Just don't ask me, 'k? I'm just here to write code.
There is no cabal.
The Cabal appreciates your devotion to secrecy.
74 matches
Mail list logo
