Am Sonntag, 5. März 2006 01:24 wrote David Schmitt:
I have put a first version online at
http://debian.edv-bus.at/vote-2006/input.xml
There is now a pre-generated plain HTML version as
http://debian.edv-bus.at/vote-2006/questions.html
online. As well as a little Makefile. Kudos
Am Montag, 27. Februar 2006 12:25 schrieb MJ Ray:
Last year, we had very helpful debate summaries posted by
David Schmitt(?) which helped solve this confusion, but I don't
know whether anyone will prepare similar ones this year.
I have put a first version online at
http://debian.edv-bus.at
Am Montag, 27. Februar 2006 12:25 schrieb MJ Ray:
Last year, we had very helpful debate summaries posted by
David Schmitt(?) which helped solve this confusion, but I don't
know whether anyone will prepare similar ones this year.
I hear you :)
Since last years summaries where quite work
On Tuesday 05 April 2005 19:29, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Mon, 4 Apr 2005 10:18:26 +0100, Matthew Garrett
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
If I sign three votes over the course of a day and then send them in
reverse order, will the votes that were signed earlier be accepted
even if they were sent
Hello, world!
After making a final run through through the debian-vote archives I now hope
to have faithfully captured 2005s DPL candidates QA on
http://debian.edv-bus.at/vote-2005/
Thank you all for making Debian an OS worth spending ones time on such things!
Regards, David
PS: IANADD,
On Thursday 17 March 2005 07:52, Anthony Towns wrote:
[...]
What happens if people still aren't happy after you've followed the
guidelines? I mean, in this case, Steve did his best to follow
established procedure for things like this, yet there's still a
many-hundred message flamewar about it.
Hello, world!
After making a final run through through the debian-vote archives I now hope
to have faithfully captured 2005s DPL candidates QA on
http://debian.edv-bus.at/vote-2005/
Thank you all for making Debian an OS worth psending ones time on such things!
Regards, David
--
- hallo...
On Wednesday 09 March 2005 14:54, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.03.03.0752 +0100]:
I don't know, maybe email debate is better, it allows for more in depth
discussion.
... and massive volumes of text, which noone with a real life can
read, think
On Tuesday 08 March 2005 09:36, Sven Luther wrote:
On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 08:39:22PM +0100, Enrico Zini wrote:
Boycott
[...]
You could take the whole pure64 mess as example :) Since it was strongly
vetoed against in debian by the infrastructure guardians, but ubuntu does
it just fine. Or
On Tuesday 08 March 2005 13:13, Henning Makholm wrote:
[See http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2005/03/msg00242.html]
Sorry Henning, after purging those sections I believe covered by common sense
definitions of team, working together and discharging responsibilites
there was nothing of your
On Tuesday 08 March 2005 14:06, Henning Makholm wrote:
Scripsit David Schmitt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sorry Henning, after purging those sections I believe covered by
common sense definitions of team, working together and
discharging responsibilites
Are you a spokesman for Andreas?
No, pardon
Dear candidates, list!
As discussed around [1], I am working on summarising all public QA pertaining
to the 2005 DPL elections at
http://debian.edv-bus.at/vote-2005/
| The aim of this collection is to briefly summaries statements from the
| candidate concerning their perspective of the DPL
On Saturday 05 March 2005 10:59, Sven Luther wrote:
On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 01:55:25PM -0800, Anthony Towns wrote:
Sven Luther wrote:
I have some real trouble with the fact that all the work i do for debian
is reported to the US secret services or whatever by the ftp-masters
and our
On Wednesday 02 March 2005 20:08, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
In order to try to keep the size of the discussion still consumeable by
as much people as possible,
Do you think it'd be feasible[1] to put essential questions and answers (like
two or three paragraphs per candidate on a website
On Friday 04 March 2005 14:22, MJ Ray wrote:
David Schmitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If there is interest I would give it a try and collect them onto the
Debian wiki or something.
Debian wiki is both editable by many and not editable by all. I
think it would be safer to put it on people.d.o
On Wednesday 02 March 2005 13:52, Matthew Garrett wrote:
Put simply, the constitution says that the DPL can't make technical
decisions that overrule other people. I agree with the constitution.
However, I will work to ensure that it's possible for people to find out
/why/ NEW is processed the
16 matches
Mail list logo
