On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 1:41 AM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 10:50:30PM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
Disbanding the TC would likely do more harm than good. There would be
no way to conclude a disagreement.
I suggested this before:
TC actions should be limited
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 9:31 AM, Sam Hartman wrote:
Russ == Russ Allbery writes:
Russ There's another alternative to using the CTTE, and my
Russ understanding is that this was generally the method used prior
Russ to the existence of the CTTE, but I'm not sure it's really any
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 6:42 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
On 12/02/2014 06:13 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
This is an interesting proposal. But it's a big change, so I think it
should be thoroughly discussed before I could second it.
I agree some discussion would be useful, but seems like it's a
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 10:35 AM, Russ Allbery r...@debian.org wrote:
Bart Martens ba...@debian.org writes:
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 05:09:00PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
note that free software interfaces to proprietary cloud platforms are
frequently used to manipulate the data in those
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 3:14 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Maybe we could discriminate on the package's priorities. For example,
about a third of the 49 packages *really* blocking the release (not
waiting for a transition) are from extra[2]. Only 5 bugs affect
required, important or standard
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 12:21 PM, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
What work will you be doing to continue Zach's efforts to negotiate with
the FSF over Debian's status as a Free Software Distribution?
Will you treat this issue as a priority? Can we expect continued open
dialogue with the FSF on this
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Debian Project Secretary - Kurt Roeckx wrote:
Hi,
A new General Resolution has been started about a diversity
statement.
More details are at:
http://www.debian.org/vote/2012/vote_002
Question on procedure:
The initiating GR mail included the following
7 matches
Mail list logo
