Re: General Resolution: Voting secrecy: First call for votes: corrected ballot

2022-03-15 Thread Michael Lustfield
Eh, I obviously forgot to fix up the reply-to bit. Sorry for the noise. -- Michael Lustfield

Re: General Resolution: Voting secrecy: First call for votes: corrected ballot

2022-03-15 Thread Michael Lustfield
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 > VOTING FORM > > - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > 6acf7f89-3eb2-492c-8715-98ae65b5f9d2 > [4] Choice 1: Hide identities of Developers casting a particular vote > [1] Choice 2: Hide identities of

Re: General Resolution: Voting secrecy: First call for votes: corrected ballot

2022-03-15 Thread Michael Lustfield
cdCQ46q7f87vw > iG5gzdXhy7tYpNHUd9syZyQMTYxxq4gaU8B9cHX5RUFqvwTR9WqBrv8qMeWNzZbg > IYnVCyS6f44lWtyopSUSw5aAOwYyYyIfIL9iym1rRJqReIUYA5fT5kSchbR9LUAI > Pfo/mZII8uCqirD+l3cDn9syiuATW5ubnVlCGWLFdbtZkrPmwU7n38Q7YrZK59o7 > cHR1lQ5qwim5B0fF90Qo/nRgwOk4fWNxhlwMCdUoeHtoAZSmuDPK8oDp6SqVdxaW > Qrsx2hnG6rKoclVMwTyEyNazcDaq9ZzMlIFRArw791J/lK3MtxnsXz3t2vonbEe1 > mvblJ8celOd3NwZU1JDtJxSrNXgI1YJxtyu53m3rlWE7G9/s7JrEpS1fbyDux+Uo > dWc8LifnOD/AKKINNM0mJOyfcZa9wg1/rtyKMJ1zgHkZA25RABEBAAGJAiUEGAEI > AA8FAmIs0tMCGwwFCQAbr4AACgkQiJt5aSvVtOONlBAAqbbaZ3+iVNxppqjxB3+Q > /v/olcD2OHBT7qRG5Lflkg/NucjxfF/6OGcRk2dX4kRxefEBG1B2gLsbrUKXnPCP > Z97ElV5OuMXOrWmYa8XYLLK3nee/b5wxAKQp60qhcD7qdmWigAnZXOLhZjeRsRym > QsC2Zqs4vRFKKgZ+SftMRIZ1C9lLXeaWvyZm+szxUz6v82hpwVhHMirJCBa+DM/b > WXwOnlEF7j/8M1noMzUJaYXXOYVHjJSCJkWV4vvlVwKp1MNKdbYwq7jKHZxdxBMB > y9w4TReIlNYLgaGzo94rBA9MVF4OOniLjEHZKx303IOSFqZlnFtEAHZUGON6uVBC > 40nISOGgLON2BKej8kRR+5u46m1x7mleeX0cUMLZGTvTNSfgedpCaGGcyWXRTJjh > Nl/tEb6FJ5n2YAmNg7rx6EgGw7KcGzhLwcEIhess4zAjjOMYMXsG+xHe8jLMMA+v > dl/h62M+KKWne7zTraPvruPfSNazi4dZ+OQSGd1IU7THIQeLzPQy3xmaGODCT2Rb > rgG5a3UmG3beq8INyM32dTCPBdaylVEvHCFV7pLJQqV4rbsjI4y1Pj80Q1nKAWd6 > KaEdm9RLst8dlGr/yqF2eKW6Anrq0BnIk2P+1WUNT6kYw3uR54zEMJsEyHhGthHv > rBx9Eic2hgSnl4hB+jxtJJ0= > =anKA > -END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK- > -- Michael Lustfield pgpw8sQEVDfhC.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: General resolution: ratify https://github.com/rms-open-letter/rms-open-letter.github.io

2021-03-28 Thread Michael Lustfield
On Sun, 28 Mar 2021 10:09:48 + Holger Levsen wrote: > On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 10:12:47PM -0500, Michael Lustfield wrote: > > Choice X: > > > > The Debian Project disapproves of recent and past actions taken by FSF. With > > regards to the latest action (re-acc

Re: General resolution: ratify https://github.com/rms-open-letter/rms-open-letter.github.io

2021-03-27 Thread Michael Lustfield
It bothers me to comment on this at all, but... I would like to propose the following resolution. Choice X: The Debian Project disapproves of recent and past actions taken by FSF. With regards to the latest action (re-acceptance of RMS to the board), it now chooses to cut ties with the

Re: Proposal to overturn init systems premature GR

2019-12-04 Thread Michael Lustfield
havior of the former. There are more appropriate ways to handle those problems. If you need help with that, I would encourage you to contact the Community Team. -- Michael Lustfield pgpdgeNVzx_Yl.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Last minute cominbations G+D and/or G+E

2019-12-04 Thread Michael Lustfield
ld all be >encouraging and pleasant, even when discussing technical problems. >We ask that communication fora owners strictly enforce this. > > 12. We respectfully ask all Debian contributors including maintainers, >Policy Editors, the Release Team, the Technical Committee, and the >Project Leader, to pursue these goals and principles in their work, >and embed them into documents etc. as appropriate. >(This resolution is a position statement under s4.1(5).) Seconded. -- Michael Lustfield pgpTPobMl6MHZ.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature