Josselin Mouette wrote:
What this position requires is the minimal level of morality to not use
it to favor an opinion or another. And this is something Manoj has been
repeatedly doing; first in the GFDL GR, next in the etch firmwares GR,
now in the lenny one.
I do not trust anymore the
In gmane.linux.debian.devel.vote, Peter Palfrader wrote:
I'm hereby proposing the following general resolution:
| Firmware is data such as microcode or lookup tables that is loaded into
| hardware components in order to make the component function properly.
| It is not code that is run on the
Julien BLACHE wrote:
I belive that Robert's resolution is a waste of time in that it adds
Doubly so.
AOL.
Cheers,
Moritz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Holger Levsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FWIW, it's orphaned since yesterday. But let's keep it in Lenny
as well, I no longer care.
Can you please elaborate? Orphaned, pretty bad security record, let's
keep it - I don't understand.
Of course it's meant ironic (for the first part), but the
Don Armstrong wrote:
Well, just to pick an example, if the TC had chosen you to deal with
the wordpress-in-stable issue, and you had personally decided it
needed to be in stable, and had done whatever work was initially
needed to get it into stable with security support, you'd still be
Charles Plessy wrote:
I started to wonder about modularity in the use of the Debian
infrastructure in 2006, because of a problem with the clustalw package.
As you can see on the graph, its popcon score started to decrease around
july.
Charles Plessy wrote:
Although I am not yet a DD, as it can happen anytime before or after the
elections, I would like to ask a question to the candidates.
Debian is growing bigger everyday. I would like to know if you think
that it should adapt to its new size, and if yes, how can you help
Hi,
I second the GR proposal quoted below.
Cheers,
Moritz
=3D=3D=3D=3D Debian Maintainers Proposal =3D=3D=3D=3D
The Debian Project endorses the concept of Debian Maintainers with
limited access, and resolves that:
1) A new keyring will be created, called the Debian maintainers
In gmane.linux.debian.devel.vote, ajt wrote:
Thanks Aj, that's the best GR proposed so far.
I second the proposal below.
Cheers,
Moritz
The Debian Project resolves that:
(a) The Social Contract shall be reverted to its original form,
as at
In gmane.linux.debian.devel.vote, you wrote:
It's my hope that this strikes a reasonable balance between respecting the
views of individual developers and advancing a viable policy for the project
so that we can move forward together on the goal of making each Debian
release a first-class,
Bernhard R. Link wrote:
4. Determines that as a special exception to DFSG #2, source code for
device firmware will not be required until we have the technical means
to split them out in a convenient way for our users.
I'd rather suggest to give a direct hint in time. Like until etch
Anthony Towns wrote:
There are, for instance, a range of outstanding RC bugs
on sudo as a result of the security release for it that need fixing,
which aiui aren't being worked on
Bdale said he would prepare a patch, that would add more documentation
and whitelist some more env vars like
Adeodato Simó wrote:
Debian and the GNU Free Documentation License
=
This is the position of the Debian Project about the GNU Free Documentation
License as published by the Free Software Foundation:
1. We consider that the GNU Free
Anton Zinoviev wrote:
Hereby I am proposing an amendment to the GR about GFDL opened by
Anthony Towns [Sun, 01 Jan 2006 15:02:04 +1000]
I wish to thank everybody who will support this amendment, especially
I wish to thank those who second it.
I second the amendment quoted below. It's my
In gmane.linux.debian.devel.vote, you wrote:
As far as I am aware, neither the proposal nor the amendment
have been modified/re-ratified; and no other GR or amendment has met
the required number of seconds; so the page at
I just seconded it; Anton's amendment now has the required
In linux.debian.vote Adeodato wrote:
I propose an amendment to this GR, consisting in replacing the
existing text with the one below. I initially tried to follow
Anthony's original text as close as possible, and just add a paragraph
and reword a couple sentences, but I didn't quite
16 matches
Mail list logo
