Re: Constitutional amendment: reduce the length of DPL election process

2007-08-01 Thread Paul Cager
Steve Langasek wrote: I know, we should set the DPL term to be equal to the release cycle; that way the DPL will be suitably encouraged to make sure the release never stalls out ;) How long will you be DPL? I'll go when I'm ready to go... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with

Re: Debian Maintainers GR Proposal - Use Cases

2007-06-26 Thread Paul Cager
On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 09:18:57AM +0200, Frank K?ster wrote: However, like Pierre, I'm not convinced that the numbers of actually interested people is large. I suspect one reason that this thread hasn't resulted in many people expressing an interest is that non-DDs tend not to read

Re: Debian Maintainers GR Proposal

2007-06-22 Thread Paul Cager
On Thu, June 21, 2007 2:50 pm, Anthony Towns wrote: Hey all, So here's a proposal for the Debian Maintainers idea that's been floating around for some time now [0]. I've drafted it while lying in bed in the Budget Backpackers before wandering up to debconf, so it's just my take on things,