On Thu, Sep 08, 2022 at 11:38:09AM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> I don't think the word "official" is defined or used in any foundational
> document, nor that its meaning is well agreed on or actually helps the
> discussion.
I had assumed "official" was in more common usage. It seems like
On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 06:36:36PM +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 08:18:55AM -0700, Ross Vandegrift wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 10:12:48AM +0200, Bart Martens wrote:
> > > The Debian project is permitted to make distribution media (insta
On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 11:00:35PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> That may sound like implementation details to you, but to me those are
> the important parts of the change. I'd rather not be in this position,
> and I have a lot of sympathy for the people pushing back on the idea
> of maybe
Hi Bart,
On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 10:12:48AM +0200, Bart Martens wrote:
> The Debian project is permitted to make distribution media (installer images
> and live images) containing packages from the non-free section of the Debian
> archive available for download alongside with the free media in a
Hi Steve,
Thanks for this. I have two questions about your proposal. Apologies
if these are answered elsewhere already.
On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 08:58:21PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> I'm proposing to change how we handle non-free firmware in
> Debian.
> So, I propose the following:
>
>
On Fri, Apr 08, 2022 at 10:19:27PM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 08, 2022 at 01:35:14PM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> > Debian does not exist, legally :-)
I'm repeating others, but I think it's important to repeat:
This may not be true. At least in the US, existence is a matter of
On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 08:23:12AM -0700, Felix Lechner wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 5:42 AM Molly dB wrote:
> >
> > I'd like to hear about where you draw the line between individual
> > issues and community wide issues. To use an example of copyright
> > claims: Would it be Debian's
7 matches
Mail list logo
