with the update (unless the package maintainer
wanted them that way).
If intervals can be adjusted from once a week to once a month,
it would be better, I suppose.
Regards.
--
Taketoshi Sano: [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
(unless the package maintainer
wanted them that way).
If intervals can be adjusted from once a week to once a month,
it would be better, I suppose.
Regards.
--
Taketoshi Sano: [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED]
described
in the proposal above.
Regards.
--
Taketoshi Sano: [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED]
, so there might be some faults.
Just to provide the starting point.
--
Taketoshi Sano: [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ish to see the things proceed, so here I second
for the proposal described in [EMAIL PROTECTED].
- --
Taketoshi Sano: [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.5 and Gnu Privacy
the things proceed, so here I second
for the proposal described in [EMAIL PROTECTED].
- --
Taketoshi Sano: [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.5 and Gnu Privacy Guard
http
per packages or other sorts of free accessories for non-free
programs,
So the package which is DFSG compliant and requires "packages" which are
not in our archive at all for compilation or execution, can be put into
contrib.
--
Taketoshi Sano: [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECT
only the companies, isn't it ?
--
Taketoshi Sano: [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED]
the package which is DFSG compliant and requires packages which are
not in our archive at all for compilation or execution, can be put into
contrib.
--
Taketoshi Sano: [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED]
non-free software ?
(just curiously.)
--
Taketoshi Sano: [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-free software ?
(just curiously.)
--
Taketoshi Sano: [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Seconded
In [EMAIL PROTECTED],
on "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 03:00:29 -0500",
with "PROPOSED: [CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT] Alternate disambiguation of 4.1.5",
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
srivasta Indeed, I had proposed this in -project
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Seconded
In [EMAIL PROTECTED],
on Tue, 10 Oct 2000 03:00:29 -0500,
with PROPOSED: [CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT] Alternate disambiguation of 4.1.5,
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
srivasta Indeed, I had proposed this in -project on
es, because it means we don't believe that the
free softwares can provide eventually all the functions which is provided
now by non-free softwares, and that the Debian project think that the
non-free archive will not be empty forever.
--
Taketoshi Sano: [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECT
don't believe that the
free softwares can provide eventually all the functions which is provided
now by non-free softwares, and that the Debian project think that the
non-free archive will not be empty forever.
--
Taketoshi Sano: [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED]
rea of the archive,
then I think the best solution is to file the bug reports to get rid of
the specific softwares with the descriptive reasons. We do not get rid of
whole the archive when we find some nasty/dreadfull security hole in our
main softwares (such as kernel or libc), do we ?
--
the bug reports to get rid of
the specific softwares with the descriptive reasons. We do not get rid of
whole the archive when we find some nasty/dreadfull security hole in our
main softwares (such as kernel or libc), do we ?
--
Taketoshi Sano: [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL
],
at 10 Jun 2000 18:55:15 -0500,
John Goerzen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Taketoshi Sano [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Does Debian include non-free software?
Any of the Debian packages itself doesn't include non-free, No.
Then users can't use the packages for non-free softwares ?
Some un
distribution
(i.e. don't need the contrib and non-free).
But, can we believe now that effectively compete in the commercial
market does not need the existence of non-free area ?
We are here to change the world, not to please the limited party.
Regards.
--
Taketoshi Sano: [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL
to these packages as well.
So, if the phrase Does Debian distribute non-free software or not?
means The Debian Project makes accessible the non-free packages ?,
then answer is Yes.
But if it means The Official Debian System includes the non-free softwares ?
then answer is No.
Regards.
--
Taketoshi Sano
20 matches
Mail list logo
