Re: Question Under Proposal D: Compile Time Option

Le 29/11/2019 à 23:32, Sam Hartman a écrit : > > Ian, I find that I'm not able to answer Simon's question with regard to > Proposal D. > > Imagine that we have a program that has compile time support for systemd > and for other mechanisms. It provides enhanced functionality when built >

Re: Draft text on Init Systems GR

Hi, Le 15/11/2019 à 07:10, Brian Gupta a écrit : > > > On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 7:51 PM Dmitry Bogatov > wrote: > > > [2019-11-14 17:15] Ian Jackson > > > Dmitry Bogatov writes ("Draft text on Init Systems GR"):

Re: GR proposal: give up on declassifying debian-private (Re: General Resolution: Declassifying debian-private results)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Dear all, I hereby support this proposal as an additional option on the ballot (but not as a replacement). Regards, Thibaut. Le 21/09/2016 à 14:53, Ian Jackson a écrit : > I think it would be best to seek further sponsors for my proposal. > If

Re: Proposed GR: Acknowledge difficulty of declassifying debian-private

Le 20/09/2016 à 18:54, Iain Lane a écrit : > On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 06:24:38PM +0100, Iain Lane wrote: >> […] > > OK then, thanks for the discussion up-(the other)thread and on IRC. I > propose this as an amendment. AIUI it either needs to be seconded by K > developers or accepted as an

Re: Proposed GR: Repeal the 2005 vote for declassification of the debian-private mailing list

Le 13/09/2016 à 08:36, David Kalnischkies a écrit : > On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 03:16:55PM +0200, Thibaut Paumard wrote: >> This is a very well defined goal that you have here. If you do care >> and do volunteer for the task, why don't you try to identify the >> relevant messa

Re: Proposed GR: Repeal the 2005 vote for declassification of the debian-private mailing list

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Le 10/09/2016 à 10:46, David Kalnischkies a écrit : > 2. My interest in declassification is (surprise surprise) apt > related, as its history has obvious plot holes. It is hard enough > to follow over a few lists which are used pretty

Re: GR proposal: give up on declassifying debian-private (Re: General Resolution: Declassifying debian-private results)

Dear Holger, Gunnar Wolf has already proposed a GR last week: 20160902041505.gd3...@gwolf.org https://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2016/09/msg4.html I think it would be better to second "his" GR and work out the details during the discussion period rather than starting a new one. Kind

Re: Proposed GR: Repeal the 2005 vote for declassification of the debian-private mailing list

I hereby second the proposal below: Le 02/09/2016 à 06:15, Gunnar Wolf a écrit : > Some weeks ago, Nicolas Dandrimont proposed a GR for declassifying > debian-private[1]. In the course of the following discussion, he > accepted[2] Don Armstrong's amendment[3], which intended to clarify the >

Re: Some stats on gr_initcoupling

Thanks, Le 19/11/2014 14:16, Alberto Garcia a écrit : Some more data on turnout, if I didn't get anything wrong (there's a couple of numbers I couldn't find in vote.debian.org). The columns are Valid votes / No. of developers / Turnout / Description 482 / 908 = 53.08% General

Re: Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init systems

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi, I second the general resolution proposal below: Kind regards, Thibaut. Le 01/03/2014 00:45, Matthew Vernon a écrit : Hi, I wish to propose the following general resolution, and hereby call for seconds. I don't think further lengthy

Re: Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init systems

Le 07/03/2014 10:52, Matthew Vernon a écrit : I wish to propose the following general resolution, This has only had one second. Dear Matthew, I am still waiting for your answer to my concerns before I make my mind on seconding this GR: