Re: new proposal: free and and non-free installers with SC change

2022-09-14 Thread Tiago Bortoletto Vaz
On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 03:00:26PM +, Holger Levsen wrote: > hi, > > I'm looking seconds for this new proposal below, which is like > proposal E plus *also* offering free installer image. > > Rationale: we should keep producing fully freely distributable > Debian installer images, for those

Re: Changing how we handle non-free firmware

2022-08-23 Thread Tiago Bortoletto Vaz
On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 11:20:09PM +0200, Bart Martens wrote: > On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 03:33:27PM +, Holger Levsen wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 05:04:49PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > > I would find it problematic if the official way to install Debian > > > *required* a non-DFSG

Re: Changing how we handle non-free firmware

2022-08-23 Thread Tiago Bortoletto Vaz
On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 12:32:54PM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote: > I hereby propose the following alternative text to Steve's original > proposal. > > I'm only suggesting to modify the third paragraph, offering to produce > two sets of images (fully-free and with-non-free-firmware), being the > later

Re: General resolution: Condemn Russian invasion of the Ukraine

2022-04-05 Thread Tiago Bortoletto Vaz
On 2022-04-05 17:02, Holger Levsen wrote: > On Tue, Apr 05, 2022 at 01:36:02PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: >> I think this thread has largely petered out, with many people having laid >> out the reasons why Debian taking a public position on this is not >> necessarily a good idea. >> >> But I

Re: Question to all candidates: Ongoing/future legal projects

2022-04-03 Thread Tiago Bortoletto Vaz
, -- Tiago On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 08:47:10PM -0700, Felix Lechner wrote: > Hi Tiago, > > On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 11:09 AM Tiago Bortoletto Vaz > wrote: > > > > Given that Jonathan, after lots of research as he describes in this > > thread, has stated that such requ

Re: General resolution: Condemn Russian invasion of the Ukraine

2022-04-01 Thread Tiago Bortoletto Vaz
On Fri, Apr 01, 2022 at 07:22:32PM +, Bill Allombert wrote: > On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 12:31:18PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > > Under 4.1.5 of the Constitution, the developers by way of GR are the > > body who has the power to issue nontechnical statements. > > > > This is a proposal

Re: Question to all candidates: Ongoing/future legal projects

2022-03-27 Thread Tiago Bortoletto Vaz
Hi Felix, On 2022-03-24 8:18 p.m., Felix Lechner wrote: [...] > > For example, I requested $217 for a one-time SSD & RAM upgrade to help > operate lintian.d.o in November of 2021. My request was not granted. I > didn't even receive a response from Jonathan (other than a request for > more

Re: Question to all candidates: Ongoing/future legal projects

2022-03-18 Thread Tiago Bortoletto Vaz
On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 05:23:42PM -0700, Felix Lechner wrote: > Hi Molly, > > On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 5:42 AM Molly dB wrote: > > > > If a Debian contributor > > was being harassed due to their involvement with the project, what > > responsibilities do you think the project would have to them?

Re: Reaffirm public voting

2022-03-04 Thread Tiago Bortoletto Vaz
On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 12:14:56PM +0100, Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote: > > Mattia Rizzolo wrote on 04/03/2022 at 12:03:22+0100: > > > [[PGP Signed Part:Signature made by expired key 0816B9E18C762BAD Mattia > > Rizzolo ]] > > On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 10:42:51AM +, Holger Levsen wrote: > >>

Re: GR Ballot Option: Allow, but do not require, secret voting

2022-03-02 Thread Tiago Bortoletto Vaz
Hi, On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 07:46:16PM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote: [...] > I have argued against this notion that private votes in some way > contradicts our principles of transparency¹, but that got no replies > whatsoever. > > ¹

Re: Ballot option 2 - Merely hide Identities of Developers Casting a Particular Vote and allow verification

2022-02-25 Thread Tiago Bortoletto Vaz
On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 05:44:34AM +0700, Judit Foglszinger wrote: > I propose a ballot option for the GR > "Hide Identities of Developers Casting a Particular Vote" > that makes the following changes to the constitution. > > 1) Do not make the identity of a voter casting a particular vote

Re: Amendment to RMS/FSF GR: Option 5

2021-04-02 Thread Tiago Bortoletto Vaz
Hi, On 2021-04-02 6:44 p.m., Salvo Tomaselli wrote: >> I sincerely think debian-vote should be read-only for non-DDs because > this person is not a DD (afaict) and is just polluting our list with > such non-sense. > > > There are non-DD people who maintain more packages and with higher total >

Re: Willingness to share a position statement?

2021-04-01 Thread Tiago Bortoletto Vaz
On 2021-04-01 9:01 p.m., Dmitry Smirnov wrote: > defeat communism and prevent it from raising > its ugly head again. Option 6: "Debian will fight hard to defeat communism and prevent it from raising its ugly head again, whatever this GR is about". Come on folks, we can do better than that! --

Re: Announcing new decision making procedures for Debian

2021-03-31 Thread Tiago Bortoletto Vaz
> On Wed, Mar 31, 2021, 19:53 Enrico Zini wrote: > Hello Debian Members, > > For some time, we have been having systemic issues that make GR > discussions painful. GRs themselves shouldn't be painful, and don't need > to be. Having a chilling effect to using GRs hurts Debian, and as a > project

Re: Cancel "culture" is a threat to Debian

2021-03-31 Thread Tiago Bortoletto Vaz
[...] > > > > Libreboot explanation can be helpful here: > > > > https://libreboot.org/news/rms.html > > I stopped reading after "Thought Criminal", "accused of defending rape > in an Orwellian smear campaign" and "orchestrated by mainstream media". Lucky you, as it goes deeper on such

Re: ***SPAM*** Re: opinion on Choice 1

2021-03-30 Thread Tiago Bortoletto Vaz
On 2021-03-30 8:10 a.m., Felix Lechner wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 4:46 AM Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote: >> >> I agree that ideas should be free. But I disagree if your point is that >> their expression should always be free. > > Wow, who would have thought? Totalitarianism returned.

Re: Some thoughts about Diversity and the CoC

2019-12-12 Thread Tiago Bortoletto Vaz
On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 03:21:09PM +0100, Gerardo Ballabio wrote: [...] > Anyway, thank you for clarifying that using people's preferred > pronouns is a requisite for being welcome in Debian. As I read them, > neither the CoC nor the Diversity Statement are explicit on that. > Maybe it would be

Re: Q to Mehdi: safe and fun

2017-03-29 Thread Tiago Bortoletto Vaz
Hi, On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 06:58:36AM +0100, Martín Ferrari wrote: > Mehdi, > > In your platform you list "Ensuring the community remains safe and fun" > as your first priority for the next term. > > I need to ask why you think in this term you will manage to do so, when > I believe you failed