Hi JMP
On 2019/03/20 03:43, Jose Miguel Parrella wrote:
> * As a DPL, what steps would you take (if any) towards reducing the
> workload and breadth of activities the DPL is expected to engage in?
Chris's "bits from the dpl" were more frequent and comprehensive than
previous DPLs, and the good
Hi Martin
On 2019/03/20 19:38, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Jonathan Carter [2019-03-20 18:57]:
>>> Not right now, although my ideas of spending Debian's money might
>>> trigger some GRs.
>
> [ I should point that your quote removes a smiley from my sentence and
> that smiley was significant. ]
* Jonathan Carter [2019-03-20 18:57]:
> > Not right now, although my ideas of spending Debian's money might
> > trigger some GRs.
[ I should point that your quote removes a smiley from my sentence and
that smiley was significant. ]
> Your platform doesn't provide much details on that, although
Hi Martin
On 2019/03/20 17:11, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Not right now, although my ideas of spending Debian's money might
> trigger some GRs.
Your platform doesn't provide much details on that, although you do
mention grants and paid-for Debian work.
Do you mind expanding on your spending
> "Jose" == Jose Miguel Parrella writes:
Jose> If DPL Team/Committee worked, and delegations start to feel
Jose> more permanent (delegated functions make sense, terms are
Jose> long) then why wouldn't a few of those delegates become Debian
Jose> Leadership Team members
* Jose Miguel Parrella [2019-03-19 18:43]:
> * As a DPL, what steps would you take (if any) towards reducing the
> workload and breadth of activities the DPL is expected to engage in?
I intend to make use of the delegations process (maybe I'll even
create some new roles) and if elected I'd like
On 15347 March 1977, Michael Meskes wrote:
But yes, depending on/with some events/companies, speaking as a DPL
will be perceived much more strongly. Any "normal" DD won't be heard.
If that is the case, and if its sufficient, a delegation can be good.
Are you saying you would delegate the
Thanks for taking the time to go through this and other people's
questions, Sam.
On 3/20/19 3:04 AM, Sam Hartman wrote:
> I've been kind of confused by all the discussions of changing our
> governance to permit this. The constitution is quite flexible in this
> area already.
> There are a couple
> But yes, depending on/with some events/companies, speaking as a DPL
> will
> be perceived much more strongly. Any "normal" DD won't be heard. If
> that
> is the case, and if its sufficient, a delegation can be good.
>
Are you saying you would delegate the role of making-presentations-as-
DPL?
> "Jose" == Jose Miguel Parrella writes:
A lot of this is in my platform but I'm answering here for clarity.
Jose> * As a DPL, what steps would you take (if any) towards
Jose> reducing the workload and breadth of activities the DPL is
Jose> expected to engage in?
I think every
On 15347 March 1977, Jose Miguel Parrella wrote:
* As a DPL, what steps would you take (if any) towards reducing the
workload and breadth of activities the DPL is expected to engage in?
Depending on the actual activity and there being any volunteers, it may
get delegated.
* Would you pursue
Thank you to all of the candidates for your nominations [0] and for
sharing your early vision for the next year (and looking forward to Simon's)
I would like to formulate a few questions not aimed to any platform in
particular. I expect some candidates will point me to their platform
page and
12 matches
Mail list logo
