On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 09:40:43PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 05:19:12PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
If anything opening the voting period sooner (so it overlaps with
campaigning) might be helpful; with the ability to vote repeatedly
people can always change their minds
Hi Brian,
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 07:54:50PM -0400, Brian Gupta wrote:
I know this has been raised in elections past, but any thoughts on the
current one-year DPL terms, and unlimited terms allowed? If thoughts
are geared toward change do you have any plans to actively try to
change the
Hi Brian,
On 27/03/14 at 19:54 -0400, Brian Gupta wrote:
I know this has been raised in elections past, but any thoughts on the
current one-year DPL terms, and unlimited terms allowed? If thoughts
are geared toward change do you have any plans to actively try to
change the status quo?
I
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 10:06:00AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
What we could try to do, though, is to make the yearly election process
more efficient. Currently, it spans over 6 weeks, with one week for
nominations, 3 for compaigning, and 2 for voting. We could reduce that
to 3/4 weeks, with:
-
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 01:24:13PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
Do you want to disenfranchise DDs who are on vacation?
What if they are in vacation for 2 weeks?
So, in fact, what you really want to do is to compare the probability
that a DD is AFK for 2 weeks with that that she is AFK for 1
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 01:24:13PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 10:06:00AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
The 2-week voting period made sense when the Constitution was written,
as intermittent internet access was much more likely back then. But
today, it's probably less
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 01:56:50PM +, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 01:24:13PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 10:06:00AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
The 2-week voting period made sense when the Constitution was written,
as intermittent internet access
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 01:24:13PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 10:06:00AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
The 2-week voting period made sense when the Constitution was written,
as intermittent internet access was much more likely back then. But
today, it's probably less
I know this has been raised in elections past, but any thoughts on the
current one-year DPL terms, and unlimited terms allowed? If thoughts
are geared toward change do you have any plans to actively try to
change the status quo?
I ask because it seems that a lot of energy is devoted to the
9 matches
Mail list logo
