Hi Steve,
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 01:03:31PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
Do you think it's appropriate for these organizers to use Debian's name in
seeking local sponsorship without consulting the DPL?
Sorry for not being clearer, but no. I think that a central repository
and/or sponsors
On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 07:55:54PM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 01:03:31PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
Do you think it's appropriate for these organizers to use Debian's name in
seeking local sponsorship without consulting the DPL?
Sorry for not being clearer, but
On Friday 21 March 2014 17:48:02 Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
[snip]
Generally, my impression is that many Debian contributors do not fancy
travelling that much, or are just too busy, and thus don't really like
to attend too many such events.
While I recognize that
- I don't know many DDs in person
Hi Neil,
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 06:44:24PM +, Neil McGovern wrote:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 04:02:57PM +, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 10:44:07PM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
At the moment, in just SPI, we have 100k USD awaiting being spent.
As an indication,
Hi Lucas,
Since I am one of the local organizers this year for DebConf, which is
Debian's single largest annual expense; and in light of the ongoing
discussion you and I are having about DebConf budgeting; it should be no
surprise that I have opinions on the question of Debian asset management.
Hi Steve,
On 25/03/14 at 00:57 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
(To Lucas) Why should Debian need to hold a reserve with its TOs to fully
fund a DebConf for which fundraising has failed? I believe the operating
principle is that the DebConf organization should never spend money that it
doesn't
Hi Hector,
On 14 Mar 2014, at 13:25, Hector Oron zu...@debian.org wrote:
Hello DPL candidates,
First of all congratulations for your nominations. I have several
questions for you, I hope you do not mind to reply:
Thanks for your question, it’s good to see a DSA member engaging with the
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 10:44:07PM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
At the moment, in just SPI, we have 100k USD awaiting being spent.
As an indication, that’s enough for a DebConf without any sponsors!
Our donations should be spent. Be that better porter boxes, or a
better backup service, or
Hi Lars,
On 21/03/14 at 16:02 +, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 10:44:07PM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
At the moment, in just SPI, we have 100k USD awaiting being spent.
As an indication, that’s enough for a DebConf without any sponsors!
Our donations should be spent.
On 20/03/14 at 22:44 +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
I don’t think there’s an “if” here. Ever since I was secretary of SPI,
I’ve been concerned about the amount of money that Debian has
earmarked. Again, I disagree with Lucas here - I don’t think that
saving donors money is a good plan, our
Hello DPL candidates,
First of all congratulations for your nominations. I have several
questions for you, I hope you do not mind to reply:
a. Debian hardware infrastructure
0. What do you think of Debian teams owning their own
infrastructure (hardware)?
1. If Debian team gets
11 matches
Mail list logo
