> And bingo, I now have a complete card! I should go get a celebratory
> drink instead of continuing to affirm my conclusion that Debian has
> become such a toxic place to be putting my energy.
What an important contribution from someone who has been on the AH/CT
Team, but cannot accept different
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 9:33 PM Martina Ferrari wrote:
>
> Fuck that
> you were in the first line on my bingo card.
> Lol, "trot" off dude.
> your amazingly stupid retort
> another character that is also fanning the flames in this list
> and also was on my bingo card, I am on a roll!!
> all
Hi Tina
On 2021/04/08 06:15, Martina Ferrari wrote:
> Ah, Adam, sending unsolicited private email? Fuck that, you were in the
> first line on my bingo card.
Personally, I would've ignored an unsolicited post like that and deleted
it. Not that I'm telling you that's what you should've done, but
Ah, Adam, sending unsolicited private email? Fuck that, you were in the
first line on my bingo card.
On 07/04/2021 22:03, Adam Borowski wrote:
On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 04:18:03PM +0100, Martina Ferrari wrote:
And bingo, I now have a complete card! I should go get a celebratory drink
instead of
Debian refuses to participate in and denounces the witch-hunt against Richard
Stallman, the Free Software Foundation, and the members of the board of the
Free Software Foundation.
seconded
And bingo, I now have a complete card! I should go get a celebratory
drink instead of continuing to
Kurt Roeckx dijo [Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 08:38:24PM +0200]:
> The option has been committed to the website, it should appear soon.
Thanks, Kurt.
The vote is now in progress, and it does include this option. I just
felt needed to state that I didn't include it in my call for vote
because, early
On Sun, Apr 04, 2021 at 09:14:31AM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 05:43:38PM +0200, Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote:
> > Move choice 7 to 8 and put it seven.
> >
> > [ ] Choice 7: Rejecting and denouncing a witch-hunt against RMS.
> >
> > (maybe Craig has a better idea)
>
>
On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 05:43:38PM +0200, Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote:
> Move choice 7 to 8 and put it seven.
>
> [ ] Choice 7: Rejecting and denouncing a witch-hunt against RMS.
>
> (maybe Craig has a better idea)
Thanks, looks goodexcept for two problems:
1. you've used the wrong article
Am 03.04.21 um 20:16 schrieb Kurt Roeckx:
On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 08:12:50PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 10:56:45AM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
Short and simple:
TEXT OF OPTION 5
Debian refuses to participate in and denounces the witch-hunt against
The option has been committed to the website, it should appear
soon.
On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 08:12:50PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 10:56:45AM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
> > Short and simple:
> >
> > TEXT OF OPTION 5
> >
> >
> > Debian refuses to participate in and denounces the witch-hunt against
> Richard
> > Stallman,
On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 10:56:45AM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
> Short and simple:
>
> TEXT OF OPTION 5
>
>
> Debian refuses to participate in and denounces the witch-hunt against
Richard
> Stallman, the Free Software Foundation, and the members of the board
of the
> Free
On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 07:15:22PM +0200, Micha Lenk wrote:
> My previous attempt yielded an invalid signature for me, so, trying again with
> a different mailer...
This one worked.
Kurt
On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 07:07:54PM +0200, Micha Lenk wrote:
> Am 03.04.21 um 01:56 schrieb Craig Sanders:
> > Short and simple:
> >
> > TEXT OF OPTION 5
> >
> >
> > Debian refuses to participate in and denounces the witch-hunt
> > against Richard Stallman, the Free Software
On Sat, Apr 3, 2021 at 6:15 PM Holger Levsen wrote:
>
> On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 10:56:45AM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
> > TEXT OF OPTION 5
> >
> > Debian refuses to participate in and denounces the witch-hunt against
> > Richard
> > Stallman, the Free Software Foundation, and
Quoting Adam Borowski (2021-04-03 18:21:54)
> On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 10:56:45AM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
> > TEXT OF OPTION 5
> >
> >
> > Debian refuses to participate in and denounces the witch-hunt against
> > Richard
> > Stallman, the Free Software Foundation, and the
My previous attempt yielded an invalid signature for me, so, trying again with
a different mailer...
Am 03.04.21 um 01:56 schrieb Craig Sanders:
> Short and simple:
>
> TEXT OF OPTION 5
>
>
> Debian refuses to participate in and denounces the witch-hunt
> against Richard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Am 03.04.21 um 01:56 schrieb Craig Sanders:
> Short and simple:
>
> TEXT OF OPTION 5
>
>
> Debian refuses to participate in and denounces the witch-hunt
> against Richard Stallman, the Free Software Foundation, and the
> members of
On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 06:21:54PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 10:56:45AM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
> > TEXT OF OPTION 5
> >
> >
> > Debian refuses to participate in and denounces the witch-hunt against
> > Richard
> > Stallman, the Free Software
On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 10:56:45AM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
> TEXT OF OPTION 5
>
>
> Debian refuses to participate in and denounces the witch-hunt against Richard
> Stallman, the Free Software Foundation, and the members of the board of the
> Free Software Foundation.
>
>
Le samedi 03 avril 2021 à 17:38:17+0200, Kurt Roeckx a écrit :
> On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 10:56:45AM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
> > Short and simple:
> >
> > TEXT OF OPTION 5
> >
> >
> > Debian refuses to participate in and denounces the witch-hunt against
> > Richard
> >
On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 10:56:45AM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
> Short and simple:
>
> TEXT OF OPTION 5
>
>
> Debian refuses to participate in and denounces the witch-hunt against Richard
> Stallman, the Free Software Foundation, and the members of the board of the
> Free
On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 03:53:58PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 06:20:47PM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
> >
> > TEXT OF OPTION 5
> >
> >
> > Debian refuses to participate in and denounces the witch-hunt against
> > Richard
> > Stallman, the Free Software
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 10:56:45AM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
> Short and simple:
>
> TEXT OF OPTION 5
>
>
> Debian refuses to participate in and denounces the witch-hunt against Richard
> Stallman, the Free Software Foundation,
Quoting Craig Sanders (2021-04-03 01:56:45)
>> Short and simple:
>>
>> TEXT OF OPTION 5
>>
>>
>> Debian refuses to participate in and denounces the witch-hunt against Richard
>> Stallman, the Free Software Foundation, and the members of the board of the
>> Free Software
Quoting Craig Sanders (2021-04-03 01:56:45)
> Short and simple:
>
> TEXT OF OPTION 5
>
>
> Debian refuses to participate in and denounces the witch-hunt against Richard
> Stallman, the Free Software Foundation, and the members of the board of the
> Free Software Foundation.
>
>
> TEXT OF OPTION 5
>
>
> Debian refuses to participate in and denounces the witch-hunt against Richard
> Stallman, the Free Software Foundation, and the members of the board of the
> Free Software Foundation.
seconded
Best
Norbert
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 10:56:45AM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
> Short and simple:
>
> TEXT OF OPTION 5
>
>
> Debian refuses to participate in and denounces the witch-hunt against Richard
> Stallman, the Free Software Foundation,
On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 05:48:47AM -0700, Felix Lechner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Apr 3, 2021 at 12:34 AM Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> >
> > The discussion period is over, no new options will be added.
>
> That does not seem right. The submission arrived during the discussion
> period and was only
On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 06:20:47PM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
>
> TEXT OF OPTION 5
>
>
> Debian refuses to participate in and denounces the witch-hunt against Richard
> Stallman, the Free Software Foundation, and the members of the board of the
> Free Software Foundation.
>
>
Hi,
On Sat, Apr 3, 2021 at 12:34 AM Kurt Roeckx wrote:
>
> The discussion period is over, no new options will be added.
That does not seem right. The submission arrived during the discussion
period and was only formally deficient, yes?
Since the discussion period was already shortened and we
On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 11:21:52PM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 02:12:25PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > This has been discussed before. It did not reset the minimum discussion
> > time.
>
> oh wow, a discussion. and a discussion has the power to change debian's
>
Hi Adam,
Am 03.04.21 um 14:31 schrieb Adam Borowski:
On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 02:12:25PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 10:59:53PM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
The last amendment (before mine) was accepted on March 30th, which means the
earliest a vote can be called with a
Hi Craig,
Am 03.04.21 um 14:21 schrieb Craig Sanders:
This has been discussed before. It did not reset the minimum discussion
time.
oh wow, a discussion. and a discussion has the power to change debian's
constitution?
Debian's constitution wasn't changed. Please calm down and read up in
the
On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 02:12:25PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 10:59:53PM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
> > The last amendment (before mine) was accepted on March 30th, which means the
> > earliest a vote can be called with a shortened 1 week discussion period is
> > April
On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 02:12:25PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> This has been discussed before. It did not reset the minimum discussion
> time.
oh wow, a discussion. and a discussion has the power to change debian's
constitution?
in any case: it will be wonderful to see Debian commit Libel
On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 01:56:32PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 10:38:23PM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 09:33:48AM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > > On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 10:56:45AM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
> > > > Short and simple:
> > > >
> >
On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 12:32:41PM +1100, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
>On Saturday, 3 April 2021 11:19:38 AM AEDT Craig Sanders wrote:
>> The witch hunt is not within debian, debian's just being dragged into the
>> angry mob.
>
>Yes to everything you've said, Craig. And the attack on Debian has been
On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 10:59:53PM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 01:56:32PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > A vote has been called.
>
> Nope, can't have been.
>
> The last amendment (before mine) was accepted on March 30th, which means the
> earliest a vote can be called
On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 01:08:50PM +0200, Micha Lenk wrote:
> Hi Adrian,
>
> Am 03.04.21 um 10:25 schrieb Adrian Bunk:
> > Craig, if you make this a new separate GR I will be glad to sponsor it.
>
> Do you (or anybody actually) have a idea how to deal best with the old RMS
> GR if this one is
On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 01:56:32PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> A vote has been called.
Nope, can't have been.
The last amendment (before mine) was accepted on March 30th, which means the
earliest a vote can be called with a shortened 1 week discussion period is
April 7th.
Any CFV before then is
On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 10:38:23PM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 09:33:48AM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 10:56:45AM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
> > > Short and simple:
> > >
> > > TEXT OF OPTION 5
> > >
> > >
> > > Debian refuses to
On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 09:14:53AM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 10:56:45AM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
> > TEXT OF OPTION 5
> >
> > Debian refuses to participate in and denounces the witch-hunt against
> > Richard
> > Stallman, the Free Software
On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 11:25:13AM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Craig, if you make this a new separate GR I will be glad to sponsor it.
why not do that yourself?
craig
On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 09:33:48AM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 10:56:45AM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
> > Short and simple:
> >
> > TEXT OF OPTION 5
> >
> >
> > Debian refuses to participate in and denounces the witch-hunt against
> > Richard
> > Stallman,
Quoting Micha Lenk (2021-04-03 13:08:50)
> Am 03.04.21 um 10:25 schrieb Adrian Bunk:
> > Craig, if you make this a new separate GR I will be glad to sponsor
> > it.
>
> Do you (or anybody actually) have a idea how to deal best with the old
> RMS GR if this one is formally accepted?
If this one
Hi Craig, hi Zlatan,
Am 03.04.21 um 10:18 schrieb Zlatan Todoric:
On 4/3/21 01:52, Craig Sanders wrote:
On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 09:07:15PM +0200, Zlatan Todoric wrote:
Yes, lets use that I am not native English speaker and drown the
conversation with some pointless pedantic approaches now
Hi Adrian,
Am 03.04.21 um 10:25 schrieb Adrian Bunk:
Craig, if you make this a new separate GR I will be glad to sponsor it.
Do you (or anybody actually) have a idea how to deal best with the old
RMS GR if this one is formally accepted?
Regards,
Micha
> "DS" == Dmitry Smirnov writes:
DS> So many man-hours were lost on this GR already in the midst of
DS> the pre-release freeze, just to name one problem...
DS> We are on a slippery slope of turning Debian into political
DS> project.
One good thing about this GR is that it
Quoting Holger Levsen (2021-04-03 11:14:53)
> On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 10:56:45AM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
> > TEXT OF OPTION 5
> >
> > Debian refuses to participate in and denounces the witch-hunt against
> > Richard
> > Stallman, the Free Software Foundation, and the members
On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 12:44:02AM +0200, Salvo Tomaselli wrote:
> There are non-DD people who maintain more packages and with higher total
> popcon than DDs, but aren't DD because didn't bother to jump through all the
> several hoops to become a DD.
>
> If you do not want DMs, make a proposal
On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 10:56:45AM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
> TEXT OF OPTION 5
>
> Debian refuses to participate in and denounces the witch-hunt against Richard
> Stallman, the Free Software Foundation, and the members of the board of the
> Free Software Foundation.
>
On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 09:33:48AM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 10:56:45AM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
> > Short and simple:
> >
> > TEXT OF OPTION 5
> >
> >
> > Debian refuses to participate in and denounces the witch-hunt against
> > Richard
> >
On 4/3/21 00:44, Salvo Tomaselli wrote:
> I sincerely think debian-vote should be read-only for non-DDs
because this person is not a DD (afaict) and is just polluting our
list with such non-sense.
There are non-DD people who maintain more packages and with higher
total popcon than DDs, but
On 4/3/21 01:52, Craig Sanders wrote:
On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 09:07:15PM +0200, Zlatan Todoric wrote:
Yes, lets use that I am not native English speaker and drown the
conversation with some pointless pedantic approaches now and bunch of words.
Oh, FFS! I was giving you a face-saving excuse
On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 10:56:45AM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
> Short and simple:
>
> TEXT OF OPTION 5
>
>
> Debian refuses to participate in and denounces the witch-hunt against Richard
> Stallman, the Free Software Foundation, and the members of the board of the
> Free
On Saturday, 3 April 2021 11:19:38 AM AEDT Craig Sanders wrote:
> The witch hunt is not within debian, debian's just being dragged into the
> angry mob.
Yes to everything you've said, Craig. And the attack on Debian has been
successful so far. So many man-hours were lost on this GR already in
the
On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 10:36:39PM +0200, Philip Hands wrote:
> My assumption would be that it was an allusion to McCarthyism, and the
> associated anti-communist moral panic in the 1950s that Arthur Miller
> dramatised in The Crucible.
yes.
It's also a tried and tested political tool used to
Short and simple:
TEXT OF OPTION 5
Debian refuses to participate in and denounces the witch-hunt against Richard
Stallman, the Free Software Foundation, and the members of the board of the
Free Software Foundation.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 08:43:15PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> There is a common pitfall that uploads signed with a key that is expired in
> the keyring are silently dropped at some point during processing.
Thanks, i'll look into that. I'm pretty sure I signed it with my newest
(2015-ish) key,
On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 09:07:15PM +0200, Zlatan Todoric wrote:
> Yes, lets use that I am not native English speaker and drown the
> conversation with some pointless pedantic approaches now and bunch of words.
Oh, FFS! I was giving you a face-saving excuse for your ignorance, not using
it
Hi,
On 2021-04-02 6:44 p.m., Salvo Tomaselli wrote:
>> I sincerely think debian-vote should be read-only for non-DDs because
> this person is not a DD (afaict) and is just polluting our list with
> such non-sense.
>
>
> There are non-DD people who maintain more packages and with higher total
>
> I sincerely think debian-vote should be read-only for non-DDs because
this person is not a DD (afaict) and is just polluting our list with
such non-sense.
There are non-DD people who maintain more packages and with higher total
popcon than DDs, but aren't DD because didn't bother to jump
On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 10:36:39PM +0200, Philip Hands wrote:
>
> You'll need to ask Craig what he actually meant by that.
>
> My assumption would be that it was an allusion to McCarthyism, and the
> associated anti-communist moral panic in the 1950s that Arthur Miller
> dramatised in The
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 2, 2021 at 1:37 PM Philip Hands wrote:
>
> Is that really what we're seeing?
Yes, that is exactly what we are seeing. Thank you for explaining it.
Kind regards
Felix Lechner
Roberto C. Sánchez writes:
> On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 06:18:51PM +0200, Zlatan Todoric wrote:
>>
>> On 4/2/21 16:56, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
>> > On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 03:49:04PM +0200, Zlatan Todoric wrote:
>> > > On 4/2/21 09:20, Craig Sanders wrote:
>> > > > TEXT OF OPTION 5
>> > > >
On 4/2/21 18:48, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 06:18:51PM +0200, Zlatan Todoric wrote:
On 4/2/21 16:56, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 03:49:04PM +0200, Zlatan Todoric wrote:
On 4/2/21 09:20, Craig Sanders wrote:
TEXT OF OPTION 5
On 4/2/21 19:09, Craig Sanders wrote:
On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 06:18:51PM +0200, Zlatan Todoric wrote:
[...] still not good enough to throw tantrums
around with "witch-hunt". Women in past were burnt alive on stakes, so stop
with extreme rhetoric when some expresses that they had it enough with
On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 03:19:02AM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
>...
> i'm down to one package these days, dlocate, which i work on when i'm able. i
> uploaded a new version of it a few months ago - the upload completed OK, but
> the new version never went into unstable. I have no idea why it just
On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 06:18:51PM +0200, Zlatan Todoric wrote:
> [...] still not good enough to throw tantrums
> around with "witch-hunt". Women in past were burnt alive on stakes, so stop
> with extreme rhetoric when some expresses that they had it enough with
> sexist behavior.
Witch-hunt is a
On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 06:18:51PM +0200, Zlatan Todoric wrote:
>
> On 4/2/21 16:56, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 03:49:04PM +0200, Zlatan Todoric wrote:
> > > On 4/2/21 09:20, Craig Sanders wrote:
> > > > TEXT OF OPTION 5
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Debian
On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 10:56:42AM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> debian-keyring (1998.09.27) unstable; urgency=low
>
> * Mon Sep 7 14:13:23 EDT 1998: [PGP/IG] Updated the key of Dima Barsky
> * Thu Sep 10 18:10:03 EDT 1998: [PGP/IG] Added the key of Craig Sanders
>
> So, to summarize:
On 4/2/21 16:56, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 03:49:04PM +0200, Zlatan Todoric wrote:
On 4/2/21 09:20, Craig Sanders wrote:
TEXT OF OPTION 5
Debian refuses to participate in and denounces the witch-hunt against Richard
Stallman, the Free Software
On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 03:49:04PM +0200, Zlatan Todoric wrote:
>
> On 4/2/21 09:20, Craig Sanders wrote:
> > TEXT OF OPTION 5
> >
> >
> > Debian refuses to participate in and denounces the witch-hunt against
> > Richard
> > Stallman, the Free Software Foundation, and the
On 2 Apr 2021, at 14:49, Zlatan Todoric wrote:
> On 4/2/21 09:20, Craig Sanders wrote:
>> TEXT OF OPTION 5
>>
>>
>> Debian refuses to participate in and denounces the witch-hunt against Richard
>> Stallman, the Free Software Foundation, and the members of the board of the
>>
On 4/2/21 09:20, Craig Sanders wrote:
TEXT OF OPTION 5
Debian refuses to participate in and denounces the witch-hunt against Richard
Stallman, the Free Software Foundation, and the members of the board of the
Free Software Foundation.
I sincerely think
On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 12:08:02AM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
> 1. Most importantly - what happens if the witch-hunt is successful and rms and
> the entire FSF board are sacked/forced to resign? Who replaces them? Who gains
> control over the FSF and the text of the GPL?
It's a broader question
On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 05:07:59AM +0100, Phil Morrell wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Apr 2021, Craig Sanders wrote:
> > Debian refuses to participate in and denounces the witch-hunt against
> > Richard Stallman, the Free Software Foundation, and the members of the
> > board of the Free Software Foundation.
>
TEXT OF OPTION 5
Debian refuses to participate in and denounces the witch-hunt against Richard
Stallman, the Free Software Foundation, and the members of the board of the
Free Software Foundation.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 12:08:52PM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
> Short and simple:
>
> TEXT OF OPTION 5
>
>
> Debian refuses to participate in and denounces the witch-hunt against Richard
> Stallman, the Free Software Foundation, and the members of the board of the
> Free
On Fri, 2 Apr 2021, Craig Sanders wrote:
> Debian refuses to participate in and denounces the witch-hunt against Richard
> Stallman, the Free Software Foundation, and the members of the board of the
> Free Software Foundation.
Hi, please can you explain how this is significantly different from
Short and simple:
TEXT OF OPTION 5
Debian refuses to participate in and denounces the witch-hunt against Richard
Stallman, the Free Software Foundation, and the members of the board of the
Free Software Foundation.
82 matches
Mail list logo
