On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 05:09:14PM +, Neil McGovern wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 09:28:17AM +0100, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
> > Hi Peter,
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 09:01:51PM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> > > On Tue, 28 Oct 2008, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> > >
> > > > I really disl
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 09:28:17AM +0100, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 09:01:51PM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> > On Tue, 28 Oct 2008, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> >
> > > I really dislike the negative tone of the original proposed resolution,
> > > so I am thin
* Peter Palfrader ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [081029 20:58]:
> On Tue, 28 Oct 2008, Peter Palfrader wrote:
>
> > I really dislike the negative tone of the original proposed resolution,
> > so I am thinking of proposing this as an alternative option.
>
> I hereby propose this alternate option/amendment a
Hi,
* Peter Palfrader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-10-29 21:06]:
> On Tue, 28 Oct 2008, Peter Palfrader wrote:
>
> > I really dislike the negative tone of the original proposed resolution,
> > so I am thinking of proposing this as an alternative option.
>
> I hereby propose this alternate option/ame
* Peter Palfrader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [081029 21:01]:
> I hereby propose this alternate option/amendment and am asking for seconds.
>
> | The Debian Project recognizes that many contributors to the project are
> not
> | working withing established frameworks of Debian and thus are not
> prov
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 09:01:51PM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> | The Debian Project recognizes that many contributors to the project are
> not
> | working withing established frameworks of Debian and thus are not
> provided by
> | the project with as much help as might be possible, usef
Peter Palfrader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (29/10/2008):
> I hereby propose this alternate option/amendment and am asking for seconds.
>
> | The Debian Project recognizes that many contributors to the project are
> not
> | working withing established frameworks of Debian and thus are not
> provided
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 09:01:51PM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Oct 2008, Peter Palfrader wrote:
>
> > I really dislike the negative tone of the original proposed resolution,
> > so I am thinking of proposing this as an alternative option.
>
> I hereby propose this alternate op
On Wed, 29 Oct 2008, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Oct 2008, Peter Palfrader wrote:
>
> > I really dislike the negative tone of the original proposed resolution,
> > so I am thinking of proposing this as an alternative option.
>
> I hereby propose this alternate option/amendment and am aski
Hi Peter,
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 09:01:51PM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Oct 2008, Peter Palfrader wrote:
>
> > I really dislike the negative tone of the original proposed resolution,
> > so I am thinking of proposing this as an alternative option.
>
> I hereby propose this altern
On 30/10/08 at 09:18 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 11:45:31PM +0100, Frans Pop a écrit :
> > I hereby second the proposal quoted below and have no objection to
> > Charles Plessy's earlier proposal being dropped (or retracted)
>
> Thanks Frans for the explanation, and than
Le Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 11:45:31PM +0100, Frans Pop a écrit :
> I hereby second the proposal quoted below and have no objection to
> Charles Plessy's earlier proposal being dropped (or retracted)
Thanks Frans for the explanation, and thanks again to Peter who showed us a
way to an exit of the cris
Although I take exception to some of the name calling that has been
done against Charles and Lucas, I am fine with switching to this
alternative proposal as its ultimate intend is identical: to safeguard
that no changes are made to something as fundamental to the project
as its membership procedure
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 09:01:51PM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Oct 2008, Peter Palfrader wrote:
>
> > I really dislike the negative tone of the original proposed resolution,
> > so I am thinking of proposing this as an alternative option.
>
> I hereby propose this alternate option/
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 08:01:51PM +, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Oct 2008, Peter Palfrader wrote:
>
> > I really dislike the negative tone of the original proposed resolution,
> > so I am thinking of proposing this as an alternative option.
>
> I hereby propose this alternate option/
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 09:01:51PM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
>
> I hereby propose this alternate option/amendment and am asking for seconds.
>
> | The Debian Project recognizes that many contributors to the project are
> not
> | working withing established frameworks of Debian and thus a
On Tue, 28 Oct 2008, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> I really dislike the negative tone of the original proposed resolution,
> so I am thinking of proposing this as an alternative option.
I hereby propose this alternate option/amendment and am asking for seconds.
| The Debian Project recognizes that
17 matches
Mail list logo
