Re: Call for votes for the Condorcet/Clone proot SSD votingmethodsGR

2003-06-21 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Fri, 20 Jun 2003 22:25:59 +1000, Hamish Moffatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: I am pretty sure I do not want people who can't even spend a modicum of effort to learn about the issues at hand to have any influence on how things are done -- we are supposed to be the How much effort do you

Re: Call for votes for the Condorcet/Clone proot SSD votingmethodsGR

2003-06-21 Thread Sam Hartman
Manoj == Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Manoj On Fri, 20 Jun 2003 22:25:59 +1000, Hamish Moffatt Manoj [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: I am pretty sure I do not want people who can't even spend a modicum of effort to learn about the issues at hand to have any influence

Re: Call for votes for the Condorcet/Clone proot SSD votingmethodsGR

2003-06-21 Thread Sam Hartman
Raul == Raul Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Raul On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 12:17:25PM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote: Actually, I think it is reasonable for me to expect the proponents of some option to do a fair bit of the work necessary to provide me with the information I need to

Re: Call for votes for the Condorcet/Clone proot SSD votingmethodsGR

2003-06-21 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Sat, 21 Jun 2003 17:56:02 -0400, Sam Hartman [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Raul == Raul Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Raul On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 12:17:25PM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote: Actually, I think it is reasonable for me to expect the proponents of some option to do a fair bit of the

Re: Call for votes for the Condorcet/Clone proot SSD votingmethodsGR

2003-06-18 Thread Glenn McGrath
On Wed, 18 Jun 2003 09:36:23 -0500 Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 11:14:19PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote: Perhaps we could have compulsory voting then :-| Why would rendering us unable to block a vote for lack of quorum be a *good* thing? If I'm not