Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...] No matter that the GR is a useless, no-op,
anti-ganneff vote, which serves no purpose whatsoever, except to kill
any motivation ganneff might have had to facilitate admission of
non-packagers into Debian. [...]
I hope it won't kill that
On Tue, Oct 28 2008, MJ Ray wrote:
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...] No matter that the GR is a useless, no-op,
anti-ganneff vote, which serves no purpose whatsoever, except to kill
any motivation ganneff might have had to facilitate admission of
non-packagers into Debian.
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...]
You think it speaks ill of people when they are demotivated by
people saying nasty things about them, or ascribing horrible motives to
them? Amazing. Me, I would be liable to just break out some beer and
watch some movies rather than
also sprach Charles Plessy [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008.10.25.0310 +0200]:
The Debian Project, by way of a general resolution of its developers, decides:
The changes announced the 22nd of October on the debian-devel-announce
mailing list (Message-id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]) are
suspended
On 11551 March 1977, martin f. krafft wrote:
The changes announced the 22nd of October on the debian-devel-announce
mailing list (Message-id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]) are
suspended [§4.1(3)]. This suspension is effective immediately [§4.2(2.2)].
I do not understand why we need to do this at
also sprach Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008.10.27.1734 +0100]:
The proposed changes are outside of the delegate's competencies.
You are wrong. The changes I propose are all well within the DAMs competency.
Please back up this claim a formal statement or delegation
specifying your
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 05:13:22PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Charles Plessy [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008.10.25.0310 +0200]:
The Debian Project, by way of a general resolution of its developers,
decides:
The changes announced the 22nd of October on the debian-devel-announce
Joerg Jaspert wrote:
On 11551 March 1977, martin f. krafft wrote:
The changes announced the 22nd of October on the debian-devel-announce
mailing list (Message-id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]) are
suspended [§4.1(3)]. This suspension is effective immediately [§4.2(2.2)].
I do not understand why
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 04:39:27PM +, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008.10.27.1734 +0100]:
The proposed changes are outside of the delegate's competencies.
You are wrong. The changes I propose are all well within the DAMs
competency.
Please
On Mon, Oct 27 2008, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
IMHO that's beside the point, even if the constitution isn't specific,
delegates should not make invasive decision for the project where it's
not obviously following the consensus, or some previous discussion. This
is actually §8.3:
8.3.
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 09:21:41PM +, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Mon, Oct 27 2008, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
IMHO that's beside the point, even if the constitution isn't specific,
^^^
I
On Mon, Oct 27 2008, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
But like I said, let's proceed with the GR, I don't mind, it's merely
disappointing.
By all means., No matter that the GR is a useless, no-op,
anti-ganneff vote, which serves no purpose whatsoever, except to kill
any motivation ganneff
12 matches
Mail list logo