On Sun Mar 08 23:40, MJ Ray wrote:
How about Shepherds Bush (Central line)?
How about accepting that he is the gender-neutral pronoun in English?
--
Matthew Johnson
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Matthew Johnson mj...@debian.org writes:
How about accepting that he is the gender-neutral pronoun in
English?
Because that's not true; “he” is a male-gender pronoun. The pronoun
“he” is sometimes awkwardly and explicitly defined for
gender-neutral use in specific cases, but it's never the
ma, 2009-03-09 kello 19:37 +1100, Ben Finney kirjoitti:
Matthew Johnson mj...@debian.org writes:
How about accepting that he is the gender-neutral pronoun in
English?
Because that's not true; “he” is a male-gender pronoun.
While I agree with Ben, perhaps we could retire this, the
l...@liw.fi wrote:
While I agree with Ben, perhaps we could retire this, the 12765th
iteration of this discussion, in favor of having a discussion about
platforms and some QA with the candidates?
Maybe this is a good time to ask the candidates what is their position
wrt this PC bullshit.
So
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 02:39:46PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
Maybe this is a good time to ask the candidates what is their position
wrt this PC bullshit.
So candidates, what do you think about this?
[ Just assuming this was a serious question, otherwise shame on me for
keeping this thread
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 02:39:46PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
l...@liw.fi wrote:
While I agree with Ben, perhaps we could retire this, the 12765th
iteration of this discussion, in favor of having a discussion about
platforms and some QA with the candidates?
Maybe this is a good time to ask the
MJ Ray wrote:
That treads on the singular they landmine. Also, it sounds like
it's the Debian Developer's validity in question.
How about Debian Developers may nominate themselves by sending a
signed email to debian-vote@lists.debian.org?
How about: To be valid, a Debian Developer can
Carsten Hey c@web.de wrote:
On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 10:53:17AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 02:18:03PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
To be valid, a Debian Developers can send a signed email in which they
nominate themselves, to the debian-vote@lists.debian.org
On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 12:53:10AM +, Per Andersson wrote:
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Debian Project Secretary
secret...@debian.org wrote:
To be valid, a Debian Developer needs to send a signed email in
which he nominates himself to the debian-vote@lists.debian.org
list.
Can't
On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 12:11:16PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 12:53:10AM +, Per Andersson wrote:
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Debian Project Secretary
secret...@debian.org wrote:
To be valid, a Debian Developer needs to send a signed email in
which he
On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 06:46:31PM +0100, Debian Project Secretary wrote:
Hi,
The nomination period for the DPL election is almost over. If you
want to nominate yourself as canidate you need to send a signed
mail to the debian-vote@lists.debian.org list.
I hereby nominate myself as a candidate
On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 02:18:03PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 12:11:16PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 12:53:10AM +, Per Andersson wrote:
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Debian Project Secretary
secret...@debian.org wrote:
To be
On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 01:36:04PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 06:46:31PM +0100, Debian Project Secretary wrote:
Hi,
The nomination period for the DPL election is almost over. If you
want to nominate yourself as canidate you need to send a signed
mail to the
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 1:49 PM, Kurt Roeckx k...@roeckx.be wrote:
On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 02:18:03PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 12:11:16PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 12:53:10AM +, Per Andersson wrote:
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 5:46 PM,
On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 02:18:03PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
You mean I can nominate someone else? ;-P
(suggested phrasing:
To be valid, a Debian Developers can send a signed email in which they
nominate themselves, to the debian-vote@lists.debian.org lists
this nicely avoids gender
On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 10:53:17AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 02:18:03PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
To be valid, a Debian Developers can send a signed email in which they
nominate themselves, to the debian-vote@lists.debian.org lists
this nicely avoids gender
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Debian Project Secretary
secret...@debian.org wrote:
To be valid, a Debian Developer needs to send a signed email in
which he nominates himself to the debian-vote@lists.debian.org
list.
Can't women nominate themselves?
Best regards,
Per
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 12:53:10AM +, Per Andersson wrote:
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Debian Project Secretary
secret...@debian.org wrote:
To be valid, a Debian Developer needs to send a signed email in
which he nominates himself to the debian-vote@lists.debian.org
list.
Can't
18 matches
Mail list logo
