> "Carsten" == Carsten Leonhardt writes:
Carsten> FTR, I'd also prefer a separate GR.
Since no one prefers combining these efforts, let's come back to secret
ballots after Russ's resolution is resolved.
Carsten> Sam Hartman writes:
>> new: 6. Votes are cast in a manner
Sam Hartman writes:
> new:
> 6. Votes are cast in a manner suitable to the Secretary. The
>Secretary determines for each poll whether voters can change their
>votes.
The manner needs to also be suitable to the voters.
FTR, I'd also prefer a separate GR.
Le 10 novembre 2021 04:08:58 GMT+01:00, Bdale Garbee a écrit :
>Pierre-Elliott Bécue writes:
>
>> Then, we realized that we could probably add Secret voting (if it felt
>> right to everyone) as the discussion on Russ' proposal didn't go in a
>> too consuming spiral.
>
>Perahaps this exposes a
Louis-Philippe Véronneau writes:
> I'd tend to be in favor of making this a separate GR.
I agree.
Bdale
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Pierre-Elliott Bécue writes:
> Then, we realized that we could probably add Secret voting (if it felt
> right to everyone) as the discussion on Russ' proposal didn't go in a
> too consuming spiral.
Perahaps this exposes a distinction between those of you who have spent
a lot of time thinking
Holger Levsen wrote on 08/11/2021 at 18:21:02+0100:
> [[PGP Signed Part:No public key for 091AB856069AAA1C created at
> 2021-11-08T18:20:57+0100 using RSA]]
> On Mon, Nov 08, 2021 at 12:12:33PM -0500, Louis-Philippe Véronneau wrote:
>> > I'd like to ask the community whether we'd like to
On Mon, Nov 08, 2021 at 10:38:01AM -0700, Sam Hartman wrote:
> Holger> all of this and additionally personally I'd also find it
> Holger> disrespectful to hijack/piggyback (on) Russ' work.
> I'm frustrated reading this message because it sounds like you've jumped
> to the assumption that
Holger Levsen writes:
> On Mon, Nov 08, 2021 at 12:12:33PM -0500, Louis-Philippe Véronneau wrote:
>> I'd tend to be in favor of making this a separate GR.
> [...]
>> Adding yet another change to this proposal would only make things more
>> complex and make the issues at hand harder to
Hi
On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 9:38 AM Sam Hartman wrote:
>
> rather than jumping to disrespect.
Please let's not fight fire with fire. I found Holger's comment quite
compassionate—at least compared to the comments he directed at me—and
would like to congratulate him.
He did not know that his facts
Your proposal seems fine at first glance. I would prefer to see this
handled as a separate GR. If they don't conflict textually, you could
run them in parallel, but honestly I'd prefer to see them run in series.
A few more weeks of delay doesn't seem to be a problem for this topic.
--
Richard
Holger> all of this and additionally personally I'd also find it
Holger> disrespectful to hijack/piggyback (on) Russ' work.
I'm frustrated reading this message because it sounds like you've jumped
to the assumption that I'm hijacking Russ's work without coordinating
with him.
I don't
On Mon, Nov 08, 2021 at 12:12:33PM -0500, Louis-Philippe Véronneau wrote:
> > I'd like to ask the community whether we'd like to handle secret ballots
> > now, or in a separate GR.
> I'd tend to be in favor of making this a separate GR.
[...]
> Adding yet another change to this proposal would only
On 2021-11-08 12 h 01, Sam Hartman wrote:
>
>
> Russ made a final call for informal discussion.
> I'd like to ask the community whether we'd like to handle secret ballots
> now, or in a separate GR.
I'd tend to be in favor of making this a separate GR.
Although I welcome Russ' & al. efforts in
Russ made a final call for informal discussion.
I'd like to ask the community whether we'd like to handle secret ballots
now, or in a separate GR.
The rationale for handling things now is that we can get it done with
and if a controversial GR comes up, we'll have the option of secret
ballots if
14 matches
Mail list logo
