On Thu, 16 Sep 2010, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
Kurt, my inclination was to consider this change as falling under
Constitution §A.1.3 as a change that does not alter the meaning of
the proposal.
Since you don't actually need seconders under §4.2.1, and you are the
proposer of the original
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 09:36:50AM -0500, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
Even better, now with attachments!
There is yet another pronoun I have missed. Please find a patch
attached.
Applied (wording / punctuation fix), thanks!
New current text is attached.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -o- PhD in Computer
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 11:40:07AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
I'm hereby introducing two changes:
a) dropping the name Debian Contributor
(attachment 0001-remove-the-term-Debian-Contributor.patch)
b) fixing punctuation as suggested by Kumar Appaiah [1], thanks!
(attachment
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 10:07:04AM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
Toni Mueller t...@debian.org writes:
I am uncomfortable with this wording:
* Active contributors of non-packaging work, which share Debian values
s/which/who/, imho. Are any native speakers around?
My opinion as a NSoE
On su, 2010-09-19 at 11:33 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 09:36:50AM -0500, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
Even better, now with attachments!
There is yet another pronoun I have missed. Please find a patch
attached.
Applied (wording / punctuation fix), thanks!
New
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
Am 19.09.2010 17:06, schrieb Lars Wirzenius:
On su, 2010-09-19 at 11:33 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 09:36:50AM -0500, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
Even better, now with attachments!
There is yet another pronoun I have
Le dimanche 19 septembre 2010 11:33:24, Stefano Zacchiroli a écrit :
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 09:36:50AM -0500, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
Even better, now with attachments!
There is yet another pronoun I have missed. Please find a patch
attached.
Applied (wording / punctuation fix),
Hi!
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 11:33:24AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
The Debian project aims at producing the best free operating system.
To that end, the project benefits from various types of contributions,
including, but not limited to: package maintenance, translations,
infrastructure
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 11:33:24AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
The Debian project aims at producing the best free operating system.
To that end, the project benefits from various types of contributions,
including, but not limited to: package maintenance, translations,
infrastructure and
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 06:42:18PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
Kurt, my inclination was to consider this change as falling under
Constitution §A.1.3 as a change that does not alter the meaning of the
proposal.
That would be A.1.6?
Yes, totally, sorry for the typo.
My question was basicly
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 11:40:07AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
I'm hereby introducing two changes:
Even better, now with attachments!
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -o- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7
z...@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -- http://upsilon.cc/zack/
Quando
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 11:40:07AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
My question was basicly if you wanted to make that change
at that time. My interpretation is that you didn't propose
to change it at that time, but that you would do it at some
later time.
The question was which part
Dear Zack,
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 11:56:32AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 11:40:07AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
I'm hereby introducing two changes:
Even better, now with attachments!
There is yet another pronoun I have missed. Please find a patch
Hi,
On Tue, 14.09.2010 at 17:53:46 +0900, Stefano Zacchiroli lea...@debian.org
wrote:
in recent events I've attended as DPL, the topic of welcoming
non-packaging contributors as project members has been a recurring one.
Since it was also part of my platform and since DPL terms don't last
Hi,
On 18/09/10 16:43, Toni Mueller wrote:
On Tue, 14.09.2010 at 17:53:46 +0900, Stefano Zacchiroli lea...@debian.org
wrote:
in recent events I've attended as DPL, the topic of welcoming
non-packaging contributors as project members has been a recurring one.
Since it was also part of my
Hi,
On Tue, 14.09.2010 at 17:53:46 +0900, Stefano Zacchiroli lea...@debian.org
wrote:
in recent events I've attended as DPL, the topic of welcoming
non-packaging contributors as project members has been a recurring one.
Since it was also part of my platform and since DPL terms don't last
Toni Mueller t...@debian.org writes:
I am uncomfortable with this wording:
* Active contributors of non-packaging work, which share Debian values
s/which/who/, imho. Are any native speakers around?
My opinion as a NSoE matches yours on this point.
--
\“Telling pious lies to
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 06:52:02PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
In case these changes are regarded as more than editorial (which is your
call, but I feel they are), the new proposal requires new seconds
I'm not sure why you think the proposal requires seconds if it
replaces an older
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 09:40:09PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
I'll let the patch linger for a couple of days -- actually, I'll be away
for most part of tomorrow -- and then I'll apply it, posting a new
complete draft here shortly thereafter.
So I'm not considering this currently as an
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 09:48:02PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
I like that a lot more than the other wording, thus seconded.
Please don't go and make this more confusing for me. As far as I
can tell this wasn't meant to be amendment yet. He will probably
accept this or something
Le Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 02:03:01PM +0100, Matthew Johnson a écrit :
OTOH, if we pass a GR that looks like we'll give them upload rights (because
it just says they are DDs) and then they aren't given upload rights some
people might feel upset that they voted for it. Just because it's not
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 10:51:51PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
Stefano's DPL platform is actually quite clear on the subject:
snip
After seeing the results of this choice, it will always be possible to
change the procedure, especially if a later DPL is elected with a
platform that goes more
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 04:08:50PM +0900, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 09:40:09PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
I'll let the patch linger for a couple of days -- actually, I'll be away
for most part of tomorrow -- and then I'll apply it, posting a new
complete draft here
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 10:45:52AM +0200, Simon Richter wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 09:48:02PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
I like that a lot more than the other wording, thus seconded.
Please don't go and make this more confusing for me. As far as I
can tell this wasn't meant
* Charles Plessy:
I wonder why not simply inviting the Debian Account Managers to
accept the long term contributors as DDs, even if they to not
maintain packages? Would an amendement be welcome?
Seems reasonable. (I'm among those who believe that voting rights are
more fundamental than
On 15/09/10 at 12:08 +0900, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
Naming (raised by at least Luca and Lars [8,9])
==
Ah, what a mess!
Until a few minutes before posting the GR proposal, the text contained a
s/Debian Members/non-uploading Debian Developers/ and before that
On ke, 2010-09-15 at 09:26 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
If we go for DDs without upload rights, I think that we should be
extremely careful about not transforming this new kind of DDs into
second-class
members of the project. A way to do that is to avoid giving them a name,
and emphasize the
Le Tue, Sep 14, 2010 mat 06:29:24PM -0700, Russ Allbery a écrit :
Charles Plessy ple...@debian.org writes:
after seeing the torrent of seconds, I am still puzzled if this GR is a
progress or a regression: is the take home message that Debian should be
more open, or that some members must
On 09:26 Wed 15 Sep , Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
If we go for DDs without upload rights, I think that we should be
extremely careful about not transforming this new kind of DDs into
second-class
members of the project. A way to do that is to avoid giving them a name,
and emphasize the fact
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 09:26:59AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
If we go for DDs without upload rights, I think that we should be
extremely careful about not transforming this new kind of DDs into second-class
members of the project. A way to do that is to avoid giving them a name,
and emphasize
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 09:26:59AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
If we go for DDs without upload rights, I think that we should be
extremely careful about not transforming this new kind of DDs into
second-class members of the project. A way to do that is to avoid
giving them a name, and
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 09:00:32PM +0900, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
The Debian project aims at producing the best free operating system.
To that end the project benefits from various types of contributions,
including but not limited to: package maintenance, translations,
infrastructure
Le Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 09:00:32PM +0900, Stefano Zacchiroli a écrit :
The Debian project therefore invites the Debian Account Managers to:
* Endorse the idea that contributors of non-packaging work might become
Debian Developers, albeit without upload access to the Debian archive.
*
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 02:13:12PM +0200, Simon Richter wrote:
I like that a lot more than the other wording, thus seconded.
Thanks for your appreciation, but wait! :-) There are no need of seconds
for this change (unless some of the previous seconders considers it
unfaithful with respect to the
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 12:20:54PM +0900, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 04:04:24PM +0100, Philip Hands wrote:
* Active contributors of non-packaging work, which share Debian values
and are ready to uphold Debian Foundation Documents, deserve the
opportunity for
On 15/09/10 at 21:00 +0900, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
Attached you can find a tentative wording of a proposal which remove the
term Debian Contributors, pretty similar to the version I had before
posting (shame on me for changing that!), but maybe a bit better in that
it doesn't the horrible
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 09:16:00PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
It seems to me that, if “albeit without upload access to the Debian
archive” were removed, it would not close the possibility for the
people in charge to difference of status.
snip
Would such a change be a happy end for everybody
Hi,
Stefano Zacchiroli lea...@debian.org writes:
---
The Debian project aims at producing the best free operating system.
To that end the project benefits from various types of contributions,
including but not limited to:
Le Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 10:01:47PM +0900, Stefano Zacchiroli a écrit :
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 09:16:00PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
It seems to me that, if “albeit without upload access to the Debian
archive” were removed, it would not close the possibility for the
people in charge to
Paul Wise wrote:
Stefano you seem to be 5 years too late with this GR, fjp's AM report
looks like he was accepted primarily for his work on documentation and
translations:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-newmaint/2005/02/msg00017.html
Not really. From my original advocation of Frans:
|
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 09:00:32PM +0900, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 09:26:59AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
If we go for DDs without upload rights, I think that we should be
extremely careful about not transforming this new kind of DDs into
second-class members of
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 02:13:12PM +0200, Simon Richter wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 09:00:32PM +0900, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
The Debian project aims at producing the best free operating system.
To that end the project benefits from various types of contributions,
including
On 09/15/2010 02:16 PM, Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 09:00:32PM +0900, Stefano Zacchiroli a écrit :
The Debian project therefore invites the Debian Account Managers to:
* Endorse the idea that contributors of non-packaging work might become
Debian Developers, albeit
Le Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 10:02:34PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz a écrit :
On 09/15/2010 02:16 PM, Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 09:00:32PM +0900, Stefano Zacchiroli a écrit :
The Debian project therefore invites the Debian Account Managers to:
* Endorse the idea that
[ Draft GR text below, look for -. M-F-T set to -vote. ]
Dear Debian project,
in recent events I've attended as DPL, the topic of welcoming
non-packaging contributors as project members has been a recurring one.
Since it was also part of my platform and since DPL terms don't last
forever,
---
The Debian project aims at producing the best free operating system.
To that end the project benefits from various types of contributions,
including but not limited to: package maintenance, translations,
infrastructure
On 14.09.10 10:53, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
Of all those topics, one topic *might* have consensus already: accepting
as DDs contributors which have contributed a lot to Debian doing
non-packaging work, which intend to continue doing so, and which are
ready to uphold our Foundation Documents.
Le mardi 14 septembre 2010 à 17:53 +0900, Stefano Zacchiroli a écrit :
---
The Debian project aims at producing the best free operating system.
To that end the project benefits from various types of contributions,
including
Le mardi 14 septembre 2010 à 17:53 +0900, Stefano Zacchiroli a écrit :
---
The Debian project aims at producing the best free operating system.
To that end the project benefits from various types of contributions,
including
Le Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 05:53:46PM +0900, Stefano Zacchiroli a écrit :
Of all those topics, one topic *might* have consensus already: accepting
as DDs contributors which have contributed a lot to Debian doing
non-packaging work, which intend to continue doing so, and which are
ready to
Am Dienstag, den 14.09.2010, 17:53 +0900 schrieb Stefano Zacchiroli:
---
The Debian project aims at producing the best free operating system.
To that end the project benefits from various types of contributions,
including but
Stefano Zacchiroli scrisse:
The Debian project therefore invites the Debian Account Managers to:
* Endorse the idea that contributors of non-packaging work might
become Debian Developers without upload rights to the Debian archive.
These new developers shall be recognized as Debian
Re: Giacomo A. Catenazzi 2010-09-14 4c8f40be.9050...@debian.org
I don't understand the procedure. You are already empowered to do it:
8.1 The Project Leader's Delegates:
1. [...]
2. may make certain decisions which the Leader may not make
directly, including approving or expelling
Giacomo A. Catenazzi c...@debian.org
So you are already free to do it by delegating. A GR would be used
to overrule your decision, but, as you already noted, there is
already a general consensus on the issue.
Equally, the DPL is empowered to start a GR to do this. I'm very
happy to see a DPL
Re: Luca Bruno 2010-09-14 20100914120120.c0d3f45b.lu...@debian.org
As we still remember the big on terminology thread[0] and we don't
want here to create more confusion nor to start the big renaming race,
I think it will be better to leave terminology out of this GR, as this
will introduce
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 05:53:46PM +0900, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
---
The Debian project aims at producing the best free operating system.
To that end the project benefits from various types of contributions,
including but
On ti, 2010-09-14 at 17:53 +0900, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
The Debian project therefore invites the Debian Account Managers to:
* Endorse the idea that contributors of non-packaging work might become
Debian Developers without upload rights to the Debian archive. These
new developers
Re: Lars Wirzenius 2010-09-14 1284461384.2573.26.ca...@havelock
I do not like the introduction of yet another class of person developing
Debian. I propose we call everyone with voting rights in Debian a
Debian Developer (development not being restricted to coding and
packaging).
We are
Am Dienstag 14 September 2010, 10:53:46 schrieb Stefano Zacchiroli:
[ Draft GR text below, look for -. M-F-T set to -vote. ]
Dear Debian project,
in recent events I've attended as DPL, the topic of welcoming
non-packaging contributors as project members has been a recurring one.
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 05:53:46PM +0900, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
[ Draft GR text below, look for -. M-F-T set to -vote. ]
Dear Debian project,
in recent events I've attended as DPL, the topic of welcoming
non-packaging contributors as project members has been a recurring one.
On ti, 2010-09-14 at 13:14 +0200, Christoph Berg wrote:
Re: Lars Wirzenius 2010-09-14 1284461384.2573.26.ca...@havelock
I do not like the introduction of yet another class of person developing
Debian. I propose we call everyone with voting rights in Debian a
Debian Developer (development
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi!
* Stefano Zacchiroli lea...@debian.org [2010-09-14 10:53:46 CEST]:
---
The Debian project aims at producing the best free operating system.
To that end the project
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 09/14/2010 10:53 AM, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
---
The Debian project aims at producing the best free operating system.
To that end the project benefits from various types of
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 17:53:46 +0900, Stefano Zacchiroli lea...@debian.org
wrote:
...
* Active contributors of non-packaging work, which share Debian values
and are ready to uphold Debian Foundation Documents, deserve the
opportunity for becoming Debian project members.
On 17:53 Tue 14 Sep , Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
---
The Debian project aims at producing the best free operating system.
To that end the project benefits from various types of contributions,
including but not limited to:
On 12238 March 1977, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
---
The Debian project aims at producing the best free operating system.
To that end the project benefits from various types of contributions,
including but not limited to:
Stefano Zacchiroli dijo [Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 05:53:46PM +0900]:
---
The Debian project aims at producing the best free operating system.
To that end the project benefits from various types of contributions,
including but not
Hi,
While I support welcoming non-packaging contributors as project members,
I am concerned that we are creating the concept of second-class DDs (or
at least, that it will be communicated like that).
I see two different ways to avoid that:
[A] Avoid giving DDs without upload rights any special
MJ Ray dijo [Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 11:26:01AM +0100]:
Giacomo A. Catenazzi c...@debian.org
So you are already free to do it by delegating. A GR would be used
to overrule your decision, but, as you already noted, there is
already a general consensus on the issue.
Equally, the DPL is
Christoph Berg dijo [Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 12:30:57PM +0200]:
As we still remember the big on terminology thread[0] and we don't
want here to create more confusion nor to start the big renaming race,
I think it will be better to leave terminology out of this GR, as this
will introduce even
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
The Debian project aims at producing the best free operating system.
To that end the project benefits from various types of contributions,
including but not limited to: package maintenance, translations,
infrastructure
Lars Wirzenius dijo [Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 12:41:24PM +0100]:
We are calling everyone Debian Developer (cf. the constitution). DCs
are a subset of DDs. We realize that we probably need a handy
expression for DD with upload rights [1], but we don't have one yet.
(Ideas?)
Could we please
* Lucas Nussbaum lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net, 2010-09-14, 18:56:
While I support welcoming non-packaging contributors as project members,
I am concerned that we are creating the concept of second-class DDs (or
at least, that it will be communicated like that).
I see two different ways to avoid
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 05:53:46PM +0900, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
---
The Debian project aims at producing the best free operating system.
To that end the project benefits from various types of contributions,
including but
Hi,
Le mardi 14 septembre 2010 10:53:46, Stefano Zacchiroli a écrit :
---
The Debian project aims at producing the best free operating system.
To that end the project benefits from various types of contributions,
including
* Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org, 2010-09-14, 19:18:
* Lucas Nussbaum lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net, 2010-09-14, 18:56:
My own preference is [B] [A] [original GR proposal]. But I'd like to
hear some other opinions before working on a draft amendment for either
[A] or [B].
Same here.
Just to
Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org writes:
* Lucas Nussbaum lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net, 2010-09-14, 18:56:
[B] Give everybody upload rights anyway. If we trust them to influence
the project's decisions through voting, we should probably trust them to
do the right thing and not upload packages when they
Re: Gunnar Wolf 2010-09-14 20100914170611.ge26...@gwolf.org
Yes, the naming clearly stems from when we were a flatter, simpler
project with all-or-nothing participation. But we now have Debian
developers which are not DDs, Debian maintainers which are not DM, and
will surely have Debian
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 01:04:32PM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
Wholeheartly seconed, for all the longstanding website translators.
This isn't signed with a key in the keyring.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 07:42:58PM +0200, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote:
I second this proposal.
This message was signed with a key not in the keyring.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Hi,
Le mardi 14 septembre 2010 10:53:46, Stefano Zacchiroli a écrit :
---
The Debian project aims at producing the best free operating system.
To that end the project benefits from various types of contributions,
including
On ti, 2010-09-14 at 18:56 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
My own preference is [B] [A] [original GR proposal]. But I'd like to
hear some other opinions before working on a draft amendment for either
[A] or [B].
I'd prefer [A] == [B] [original GR proposal] [NOTA].
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
This time with the key that's still in the keyring, only noticed after
sending that I haven't got it replaced in the keyring yet.
* Stefano Zacchiroli lea...@debian.org [2010-09-14 10:53:46 CEST]:
Hi,
Lucas Nussbaum a écrit , Le 14/09/2010 18:56:
While I support welcoming non-packaging contributors as project members,
I am concerned that we are creating the concept of second-class DDs (or
at least, that it will be communicated like that).
I see two different ways to avoid that:
Charles Plessy ple...@debian.org writes:
I agree with the above, accepting as DDs contributors who do not
maintain packages, but your proposal is different: it establishes a new
class of project members, who differ by not having upload rights.
I suppose that the goal is to avoid disruptive
Christoph Berg m...@debian.org writes:
Re: Luca Bruno 2010-09-14 20100914120120.c0d3f45b.lu...@debian.org
I'd thus propose not to call them Debian Contributors (DC) now, and let
NM/DAM team pick an appropriate name when reforming the procedures.
The idea was discussed, and that's the name we
Le Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 06:56:01PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
My own preference is [B] [A] [original GR proposal]. But I'd like to
hear some other opinions before working on a draft amendment for either
[A] or [B].
Hi Lucas and everybody,
after seeing the torrent of seconds, I am
Stefano you seem to be 5 years too late with this GR, fjp's AM report
looks like he was accepted primarily for his work on documentation and
translations:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-newmaint/2005/02/msg00017.html
In addition, as cate pointed out, the constitution already allows
DAM/FD to
Charles Plessy ple...@debian.org writes:
after seeing the torrent of seconds, I am still puzzled if this GR is a
progress or a regression: is the take home message that Debian should be
more open, or that some members must not have upload rights ? When a
member does not have upload rights, is
Dear Paul,
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 09:25:09AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
Stefano you seem to be 5 years too late with this GR, fjp's AM report
looks like he was accepted primarily for his work on documentation and
translations:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-newmaint/2005/02/msg00017.html
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 9:54 AM, Kumar Appaiah
a.ku...@alumni.iitm.ac.in wrote:
The word Debian Developer seems to have become synonymous with
those who package or write software for Debian. Whether that was
intentional or unintentional is not known to me, but this aspect is
what several
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 05:53:46PM +0900, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
[ Draft GR text below, look for -. M-F-T set to -vote. ]
[ Disclaimer: I'm attending an academic conference this week and I'll be
at the Italian mini-DebConf in the week-end. That's why I'll be
sluggish in participating
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 04:04:24PM +0100, Philip Hands wrote:
* Active contributors of non-packaging work, which share Debian values
and are ready to uphold Debian Foundation Documents, deserve the
opportunity for becoming Debian project members.
93 matches
Mail list logo
