Le lundi, 20 octobre 2014, 12.17:14 Neil McGovern a écrit :
Ian's: make each package support all alternative init systems
This is actively misleading in a least four ways:
Yup, I wouldn't count that as neutral either. How about:
Your two proposals don't seem to match Ian's to which
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 08:14:44AM +0200, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
Le lundi, 20 octobre 2014, 12.17:14 Neil McGovern a écrit :
Ian's: make each package support all alternative init systems
This is actively misleading in a least four ways:
Yup, I wouldn't count that as neutral
Neil McGovern writes (Re: GR option text on ballots):
On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 03:18:52PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
I would be very displeased if the Secretary chooses to use a text for
my proposal which was suggested by my opponent, and which I think
contains coded criticisms of my proposal
Nikolaus Rath writes (Re: GR option text on ballots):
Ian Jackson ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk writes:
If the Secretary feels we have to have a neutral rather than a
positive phrasing I would request that we use the following summary
line for my proposal:
Packages may not require
On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 03:18:52PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
IMO summary lines should certainly not be written by opponents of the
proposed option. Please would you as Secretary confirm that you will
seek to use a summary text that both I (as proponent) and you are
happy with.
Please see
On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 03:18:52PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
Lucas Nussbaum writes (Re: GR option text on ballots):
I'd like to propose:
I would like to reiterate my view that these summaries should be
positive, and written by the proponent of each version, so long
Lucas Nussbaum writes (Re: GR option text on ballots):
I'd like to propose:
I would like to reiterate my view that these summaries should be
positive, and written by the proponent of each version, so long as
they are not misleading.
IMO summary lines should certainly not be written by opponents
Ian Jackson ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk writes:
If the Secretary feels we have to have a neutral rather than a
positive phrasing I would request that we use the following summary
line for my proposal:
Packages may not require a specific init system
Why not s/a/one/ as in your
8 matches
Mail list logo