* Jonathan Carter [2019-03-21 21:23]:
> 1. Do you think that free software is inherently political? Do you think
> there's place for politics in free software?
Maybe you define "politics" in a different way to me (and maybe I mix
it up with what would better be describes as "philosophy"), but
On 21/03/19 at 23:04 +0200, Jonathan Carter wrote:
> I do think that we should perhaps also be more diligent when
> considering non-technical consequences of our decisions.
I'm curious: can you give an example here?
Lucas
On 3/21/19 5:04 PM, Jonathan Carter wrote:
On 2019/03/21 22:25, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
Yes, please go.
1. Do you think that free software is inherently political? Do you think
there's place for politics in free software?
2. The same as #1, but for Debian instead of free software.
Well, I
On 15348 March 1977, Jonathan Carter wrote:
1. Do you think that free software is inherently political? Do you think
there's place for politics in free software?
2. The same as #1, but for Debian instead of free software.
Well, I think that in the case of #1, the Free Software Foundation (and
On 2019/03/21 22:25, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> Yes, please go.
>
>> 1. Do you think that free software is inherently political? Do you think
>> there's place for politics in free software?
>> 2. The same as #1, but for Debian instead of free software.
Well, I think that in the case of #1, the Free
On 15348 March 1977, Jonathan Carter wrote:
My question is to the other 4 DPL candidates, and I'm happy to answer it
too if anyone is interested in my view.
Yes, please go.
1. Do you think that free software is inherently political? Do you think
there's place for politics in free software?
I know some people will be unhappy at me just for asking this question,
but we would be naive to ignore the topic all together, and I don't know
exactly where the others draw their lines yet.
My question is to the other 4 DPL candidates, and I'm happy to answer it
too if anyone is interested in
7 matches
Mail list logo
