Re: Non-free package licenses and replacements

2004-01-26 Thread Sven Luther
On Sat, Jan 24, 2004 at 02:29:39AM +0200, Niklas Vainio wrote: I've put up a web page listing possible replacements for packages currently in non-free. There are still lot of blanks - please give suggestions. Perhaps this page can help in the discussion about removing non-free. BTW, maybe it

Re: Non-free package licenses and replacements

2004-01-26 Thread Sven Luther
On Sat, Jan 24, 2004 at 02:29:39AM +0200, Niklas Vainio wrote: I've put up a web page listing possible replacements for packages currently in non-free. There are still lot of blanks - please give suggestions. Perhaps this page can help in the discussion about removing non-free. BTW, maybe it

Re: Non-free package licenses and replacements

2004-01-24 Thread Mathieu Roy
Niklas Vainio [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: I've put up a web page listing possible replacements for packages currently in non-free. There are still lot of blanks - please give suggestions. Perhaps this page can help in the discussion about removing non-free. Also included is explanation why the

Re: Non-free package licenses and replacements

2004-01-24 Thread Kenneth Pronovici
[I'm subscribed to -devel but not -vote or -legal, so please CC appropriately.] I've put up a web page listing possible replacements for packages currently in non-free. There are still lot of blanks - please give suggestions. Perhaps this page can help in the discussion about removing

Non-free package licenses and replacements

2004-01-23 Thread Niklas Vainio
I've put up a web page listing possible replacements for packages currently in non-free. There are still lot of blanks - please give suggestions. Perhaps this page can help in the discussion about removing non-free. Also included is explanation why the package is in non-free. This is based on the