On Wed, 19 Mar 2008, Don Armstrong wrote:
What do the DPL candidates feel about this? Do we require a GR to
direct how account creation and keyring management is to be handled?
Given my other answer in this thread, my answer is hopefully not.
But if discussions and improvement proposals don't
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 02:22:50AM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
As near as I can gather, it appears that so far no one feels to have
the power necessary to change how account creation and key
modification actually works.
What do the DPL candidates feel about this? Do we require a GR to
direct how
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 10:24:17AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
I know that account creation would be quick so long as you're active in
the team
That sentence could have ended right there, the fact that there is a SPoF
there is problematic enough.
--
2. That which causes joy or
On mer, 2008-03-19 at 16:45 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
It seems logical that everybody who is AM approved has successfully
passed the various checks.
Yes, but, as we say here: « cela va sans dire, mais ça va encore mieux
en le disant »
(“it goes without saying, but it goes better saying
On Thursday 20 March 2008 07:33, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
When you register to NM process, you're asked to check boxes if you
agree to Social Contract etc. But those checks aren't really enough.
What you have is to say (somewhere on a signed mail) that you agree.
Currently only the AM receives
On Sat, 15 Mar 2008, Nacho Barrientos Arias wrote:
If you get elected, what will you do to prevent people from waiting
for weeks (and usually for months) to see their account created after
DAM approval?
I think the problem would be trivial to fix. The DAM should be the
party that makes the
On Wed, 19 Mar 2008, Peter Palfrader wrote:
I think the problem would be trivial to fix. The DAM should be the
party that makes the *policy decision*, and then DSA should be
tasked with actually creating the account, and keyring-maint with
adding the key to the debian keyring.
What is needed
Hi,
On Wed, 19 Mar 2008, Peter Palfrader wrote:
On Sat, 15 Mar 2008, Nacho Barrientos Arias wrote:
If you get elected, what will you do to prevent people from waiting
for weeks (and usually for months) to see their account created after
DAM approval?
I think the problem would be
Raphael Hertzog [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 17 Mar 2008, MJ Ray wrote:
Is creating accounts really now a sub-two-minute task? If so, that's
great, but I believed there was still often a lot of multi-step
independent double-checking in that task.
Honestly I don't know. But if it's
On Wed, 19 Mar 2008, MJ Ray wrote:
Raphael Hertzog [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 17 Mar 2008, MJ Ray wrote:
Is creating accounts really now a sub-two-minute task? If so, that's
great, but I believed there was still often a lot of multi-step
independent double-checking in that task.
Raphael Hertzog [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 19 Mar 2008, MJ Ray wrote:
Are you (or any other candidates) arguing for an NM-portfolio, a
document that summarises the applicant in a way that most developers
could understand why the applicant was given an account, if they saw
that
On Wed, 19 Mar 2008, MJ Ray wrote:
(For example, answered all my questions about the social contract,
DFSG, BTS, etc. in a good way leaps out at me. Not wrong, as such,
but that's an unusual way to put it - has any applicant ever been
described as answering them in a bad way?)
Either he made
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 09:58:45AM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
I think the problem would be trivial to fix. The DAM should be the
party that makes the *policy decision*, and then DSA should be tasked
with actually creating the account, and keyring-maint with adding the
key to the debian
On Mon, 17 Mar 2008, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
Depending on the quality of the report (which doesnt mean quality of AM
or NM, also amount of mails and quoting style the people use and
stuff like that), its between 30 and 60 minutes.
If one does a reject you can count at least 2 hours, as you then
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 07:34:49PM +, Russ Allbery wrote:
Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
FWIW Reviewing an AM report and an application is nothing near a small
5 minutes task. I believe it's rather 30 minutes of work per applicant
if you do it seriously enough. Creating
(resending to list, I responded privately by error)
Hi,
On Sat, 15 Mar 2008, Nacho Barrientos Arias wrote:
If you get elected, what will you do to prevent people from waiting
for weeks (and usually for months) to see their account created after
DAM approval?
Account creation is not the only
On Mon, 17 Mar 2008, MJ Ray wrote:
Raphael Hertzog [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...] It's well known that small
task (when they take less than 5 minutes) are usually best done on the
fly instead of accumulating them. [...]
Where is this well known? I thought opinion was divided. See
Raphael Hertzog [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...] It's well known that small
task (when they take less than 5 minutes) are usually best done on the
fly instead of accumulating them. [...]
Where is this well known? I thought opinion was divided. See
Ganging your mosquito tasks
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 10:40:18AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
GTD is quite popular and has been discussed on planet Debian several times
together with the Inbox Zero principle... that's why I said well-known.
But you're right that I should have given more references.
Note that the whole
Raphael Hertzog [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 17 Mar 2008, MJ Ray wrote:
Where is this well known? I thought opinion was divided. [...]
I must admit that I've read some Getting Things Done related literature
and that this organization method usually suggests to do small tasks on the
fly
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 07:35:35AM +, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
We need to break that logic. I would like to talk with James and try to
convince him to create accounts as they come. It's well known that small
task (when they take less than 5 minutes) are usually best done on the
fly instead
On 17/03/2008, MJ Ray wrote:
Is creating accounts really now a sub-two-minute task? If so, that's
great, but I believed there was still often a lot of multi-step
independent double-checking in that task.
If not so, is that sooo long that there are only a
couple of runs each
On Mon, 17 Mar 2008, MJ Ray wrote:
Is creating accounts really now a sub-two-minute task? If so, that's
great, but I believed there was still often a lot of multi-step
independent double-checking in that task.
Honestly I don't know. But if it's not, then it gives us at least
a precise idea of
On 11327 March 1977, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
We need to break that logic. I would like to talk with James and try to
convince him to create accounts as they come. It's well known that small
task (when they take less than 5 minutes) are usually best done on the
fly instead of accumulating them.
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 11:35:18AM +0100, Nacho Barrientos Arias wrote:
Hello,
If you get elected, what will you do to prevent people from waiting
for weeks (and usually for months) to see their account created after
DAM approval?
Hi Nacho,
NM is one of quite a few areas in Debian that I'd like
Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
FWIW Reviewing an AM report and an application is nothing near a small
5 minutes task. I believe it's rather 30 minutes of work per applicant
if you do it seriously enough. Creating an account should though
(meaning I don't know if it is, but I see
Hello,
If you get elected, what will you do to prevent people from waiting
for weeks (and usually for months) to see their account created after
DAM approval?
Good luck and thanks for your attention!
--
bye,
- Nacho
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 11:35:18AM +0100, Nacho Barrientos Arias wrote:
If you get elected, what will you do to prevent people from waiting
for weeks (and usually for months) to see their account created after
DAM approval?
I would like to extend this question to what will you do to improve
28 matches
Mail list logo
