On Thursday 20 March 2008 07:33, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> When you register to NM process, you're asked to check boxes if you
> agree to Social Contract etc. But those checks aren't really enough.
> What you have is to say (somewhere on a signed mail) that you agree.
> Currently only the AM recei
On mer, 2008-03-19 at 16:45 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> It seems logical that everybody who is AM approved has successfully
> passed the various checks.
Yes, but, as we say here: « cela va sans dire, mais ça va encore mieux
en le disant »
(“it goes without saying, but it goes better saying it
On Wed, 19 Mar 2008, MJ Ray wrote:
> (For example, "answered all my questions about the social contract,
> DFSG, BTS, etc. in a good way" leaps out at me. Not wrong, as such,
> but that's an unusual way to put it - has any applicant ever been
> described as answering them "in a bad way"?)
Either
Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Mar 2008, MJ Ray wrote:
> > Are you (or any other candidates) arguing for an NM-portfolio, a
> > document that summarises the applicant in a way that most developers
> > could understand why the applicant was given an account, if they saw
> >
On Wed, 19 Mar 2008, MJ Ray wrote:
> Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, 17 Mar 2008, MJ Ray wrote:
> > > Is creating accounts really now a sub-two-minute task? If so, that's
> > > great, but I believed there was still often a lot of multi-step
> > > independent double-checking i
Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Mar 2008, MJ Ray wrote:
> > Is creating accounts really now a sub-two-minute task? If so, that's
> > great, but I believed there was still often a lot of multi-step
> > independent double-checking in that task.
>
> Honestly I don't know. But i
On Mon, 17 Mar 2008, MJ Ray wrote:
> Is creating accounts really now a sub-two-minute task? If so, that's
> great, but I believed there was still often a lot of multi-step
> independent double-checking in that task.
Honestly I don't know. But if it's not, then it gives us at least
a precise idea o
On 17/03/2008, MJ Ray wrote:
> Is creating accounts really now a sub-two-minute task? If so, that's
> great, but I believed there was still often a lot of multi-step
> independent double-checking in that task.
If not so, is that sooo long that there are only a
couple of runs each *
Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Mar 2008, MJ Ray wrote:
> > Where is this well known? I thought opinion was divided. [...]
>
> I must admit that I've read some "Getting Things Done" related literature
> and that this organization method usually suggests to do small tasks on
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 10:40:18AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> GTD is quite popular and has been discussed on planet Debian several times
> together with the "Inbox Zero" principle... that's why I said "well-known".
> But you're right that I should have given more references.
Note that the wh
On Mon, 17 Mar 2008, MJ Ray wrote:
> Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > [...] It's well known that small
> > task (when they take less than 5 minutes) are usually best done "on the
> > fly" instead of accumulating them. [...]
>
> Where is this well known? I thought opinion was divided
Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...] It's well known that small
> task (when they take less than 5 minutes) are usually best done "on the
> fly" instead of accumulating them. [...]
Where is this well known? I thought opinion was divided. See
Ganging your mosquito tasks http://www.4
12 matches
Mail list logo
