Le Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 05:42:24PM -0300, Margarita Manterola a écrit :
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Charles Plessy wrote:
>
> >> * Do you need to come up with a GR to change membership procedures, or is
> >> there
> >> a different way?
> >
> > I will cast a GR if I think it is needed. If
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Charles Plessy wrote:
>> * Do you need to come up with a GR to change membership procedures, or is
>> there
>> a different way?
>
> I will cast a GR if I think it is needed. If I am wrong, the result will be
> NOTA, and I will resign as DPL.
You'd really resign
> * Did you or do you plan to talk to DAM/Frontdesk about membership changes?
Discussion must be public from the start. DAM/Frontdesk is contribution
essential. Your position will be first in the discussion's summary.
> * Do you need to come up with a GR to change membership procedures, or is
>
Hi Charles,
thanks for you long answer. But unfortunately I feel like a journalist now,
instead of getting a short *answer* to my questions, I got a looong talk around
them. So here are they again, in a very simplified form:
* Did you or do you plan to talk to DAM/Frontdesk about membership chang
Le Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 02:06:44PM +0100, Bernd Zeimetz a écrit :
> Charles Plessy wrote:
>
> > If I am elected DPL, I will re-open the discussion and lead them in a way
> > that
> > maximises everybody's contribution, for instance by making pauses if
> > necessary,
> > and by posting neutral su
Charles Plessy wrote:
> If I am elected DPL, I will re-open the discussion and lead them in a way that
> maximises everybody's contribution, for instance by making pauses if
> necessary,
> and by posting neutral summaries. After the discussion reaches conclusion, I
> will initiate a GR.
When did
On Thu Mar 25 21:19, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> The GR we had on DAM proposal [2] has been only on the procedure which
> led to the d-d-a mail. In fact, the outcome of the GR asks for
> discussion+consensus (or vote), but we've never dwelled into that
> afterwords.
I did try quite hard, b
Charles Plessy writes:
> In this thread it was proposed to trust DDs to nominate other members
> and I found the idea very interesting. In order to make it more
> consensual, there is probably a need for making concessions like
> shortlisting the trusted DDs according to some criteria like the tim
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 09:17:44AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> In this thread it was proposed to trust DDs to nominate other members
> and I found the idea very interesting. In order to make it more
> consensual, there is probably a need for making concessions like
> shortlisting the trusted DD
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 9:17 PM, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Following the ‘Membership procedures’ GR, discussion on membership were
> started
> after the Lenny release, but eventually stopped. In this thread it was
> proposed
> to trust DDs to nominate other members and I found the idea very inter
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 09:17:44AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Following the ‘Membership procedures’ GR, discussion on membership
> were started after the Lenny release, but eventually stopped. In this
> thread it was proposed to trust DDs to nominate other members and I
> found t
On Wed, Mar 24 2010, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Following the ‘Membership procedures’ GR, discussion on membership
> were started after the Lenny release, but eventually stopped. In this
> thread it was proposed to trust DDs to nominate other members and I
> found the idea very interest
Hi Charles,
On Donnerstag, 25. März 2010, Charles Plessy wrote:
> [...] In order to make it more consensual, there is probably a
> need for making concessions like shortlisting the trusted DDs according to
> some criteria like [...]
What do you mean by "shortlisting"?
cheers,
Holger
s
Dear all,
Following the ‘Membership procedures’ GR, discussion on membership were started
after the Lenny release, but eventually stopped. In this thread it was proposed
to trust DDs to nominate other members and I found the idea very interesting.
In order to make it more consensual, there is prob
14 matches
Mail list logo
