Le Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 10:32:22PM -0600, Gunnar Wolf a écrit :
>
> What would be different if there was no leader? Where would the
> project lose more? Would it gain in some aspect?
Hello Gunnar,
Biology shows that complex systems often evolved “leaders”, even when they are
selected or take th
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 09:53:46AM -0300, Margarita Manterola wrote:
> I know, but if we were to be without a DPL, those delegations could
> not be re-validated. It is not clear by reading the Constitution what
> would happen to the "DPL delegates" if there was no DPL. However,
> even assuming th
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 9:41 AM, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
wrote:
>> Without a leader, the press team would have to be delegated by the
>> body of developers, through a GR or similar election, in order to
>> actually be "the voice of Debian".
>
> Leaving out meta questions, when one can be consid
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 11:07:32PM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Of course - But we do have a press team. If we were to lack a Leader,
> the press team would just become the contact point for the press,
> right?
Right, but the difference is in "directionality".
The press team puts into use their ab
Hi!
Margarita Manterola schrieb:
Without a leader, the press team would have to be delegated by the
body of developers, through a GR or similar election, in order to
actually be "the voice of Debian".
Leaving out meta questions, when one can be considered to be "the voice
of Debian", but the
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 2:07 AM, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Of course - But we do have a press team. If we were to lack a Leader,
> the press team would just become the contact point for the press,
> right?
Without a leader, the press team would have to be delegated by the
body of developers, through
Toni Mueller dijo [Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 11:27:57AM +0100]:
> > What would be different if there was no leader? Where would the
> > project lose more? Would it gain in some aspect?
>
> I am not a candidate, but I can immediately see that the press would
> take the voice of "random DDs" as the voice
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 1:32 AM, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> What would be different if there was no leader? Where would the
> project lose more? Would it gain in some aspect?
The Constitution gives the DPL a number of duties that would then be
vacant. Even though it wouldn't necessarily lead to total
[ quoted text reordered ]
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 10:32:22PM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> (Yes, quite a hypothetical question. However, if 10-year predictions
> are allowed, then mine is too ;-) )
Well, let's not drift too much in that direction, shall we? :-)
(Just kidding, this question is perfe
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 10:32:22PM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> So, today is April 15, and our Secretary prepares for a very difficult
> announcement: There is a majority of votes for NOTA. Or we didn't
> reach quorum. Or whatever you fancy - But the result is, none of the
> four candidates won the
Hi,
On Tue, 16.03.2010 at 22:32:22 -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> As per Constitution 5.2.4, the vote should be repeated, as many times
> as needed. Lets just assume it was different: The project has voted
> not to have a leader anymore.
>
> What would be different if there was no leader? Where wo
So, today is April 15, and our Secretary prepares for a very difficult
announcement: There is a majority of votes for NOTA. Or we didn't
reach quorum. Or whatever you fancy - But the result is, none of the
four candidates won the election.
As per Constitution 5.2.4, the vote should be repeated, a
12 matches
Mail list logo
