On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 07:41:34PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>On 21/03/09 at 02:34 +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> >Zack wrote that no one already contributing to Debian should be
>> >authorized to pick bounties offered by Debian directly. Would you
>> >encourage a similar position for bounties
On 21/03/09 at 02:34 +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> >Zack wrote that no one already contributing to Debian should be
> >authorized to pick bounties offered by Debian directly. Would you
> >encourage a similar position for bounties offered as part of the Google
> >Summer of Code, for example?
>
> N
Hey Lucas,
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 12:42:11PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>
>This raises the question of bounties sponsored by companies to do Debian
>development. Of course, the DPL can't prevent companies from offering
>money to do Debian work. However, as a DPL (or 2IC), will you actively
>see
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 12:42:11PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> This raises the question of bounties sponsored by companies to do
> Debian development. Of course, the DPL can't prevent companies from
> offering money to do Debian work. However, as a DPL (or 2IC), will
> you actively seek such spo
On 20/03/09 at 11:50 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> Other potential usages of Debian moneys are bounties, to which I'm not
> opposed in principle. However, they should obey to very specific
> rules. The first one is that no one already contributing to Debian
> should be authorized to pick them
5 matches
Mail list logo
