On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 11:15:10PM +, Ben Finney wrote:
Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 10:20:05PM +, Ben Finney wrote:
Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The SC speaks about software, and doesn't define it.
The statement that
Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 11:15:10PM +, Ben Finney wrote:
That seems to be an argument for proposing a re-wording of the
DFSG, so that freedoms are defined without referring to that mess
of terms. I would agree that could be a good motivation in
Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yes, I believe the DFSG are clumsy when it comes to its terms. Component
is clear. Firmwares are part of Debian components for sure, there is
absolutely no doubt about that. But I'm honnestly not sure what
programs or software mean, and in §2 that's
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 11:54:25PM +, Russ Allbery wrote:
Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yes, I believe the DFSG are clumsy when it comes to its terms. Component
is clear. Firmwares are part of Debian components for sure, there is
absolutely no doubt about that. But I'm
Le Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 10:51:54AM +1100, Ben Finney a écrit :
Is now a good time to propose such a GR?
I really do not think so. As you see, it creates discordance in the Project,
kills the fun, sinks energy, makes people asking for each other's heads and
starts a process that has many dead
5 matches
Mail list logo
