Re: Why the gr_lenny ballot is the way it is

2008-12-18 Thread Josselin Mouette
Manoj, please stop your logorrhea. By the time it would take to read your 27 posts on this list in 8 hours, it would be enough to fix a handful of bugs. Le mercredi 17 décembre 2008 à 12:15 -0600, Manoj Srivastava a écrit : Also, splitting a vote into multiple ballots, with related

Re: Why the gr_lenny ballot is the way it is

2008-12-18 Thread Margarita Manterola
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 4:15 PM, Manoj Srivastava sriva...@debian.org wrote: So, while the power set of the options is not feasible, we could have a slew of options combining the various proposed options, if people wanted to vote on a compatible set of options. No. As I've said,

Why the gr_lenny ballot is the way it is

2008-12-17 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi, This whole set of discussions and proposals started a couple of months ago, when concerns were raised about firmware blobs, dfsg violations, and the release. This, after a round of disuccion, led to three proposals on how the release should be conducted, in view of firmware blobs

Re: Why the gr_lenny ballot is the way it is

2008-12-17 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 12:15:22PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava a écrit : So, while the power set of the options is not feasible, we could have a slew of options combining the various proposed options, if people wanted to vote on a compatible set of options. Hi Manoj, I am affraid I